Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27352081›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology2016

Exposure Calls to U. S. Poison Centers Involving Electronic Cigarettes and Conventional Cigarettes-September 2010-December 2014.

Kevin Chatham-Stephens, Royal Law, Ethel Taylor, Stephanie Kieszak, Paul Melstrom, Rebecca Bunnell, Baoguang Wang, Hannah Day, Benjamin Apelberg, Lee Cantrell and 2 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Electronic Cigarettes: Exposure and Use Among Pediatric Populations.Journal of aerosol medicine and pulmonary drug delivery · 2018
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Kevin Chatham-StephensDivision of Environmental Hazards and Health Effects, National Center for Environmental Health, CDC, Atlanta, GA, USA. xdc4@cdc.gov.ORCID 0000-0002-0511-992X
Royal LawDivision of Environmental Hazards and Health Effects, National Center for Environmental Health, CDC, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Ethel TaylorDivision of Environmental Hazards and Health Effects, National Center for Environmental Health, CDC, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Stephanie KieszakDivision of Environmental Hazards and Health Effects, National Center for Environmental Health, CDC, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Paul MelstromOffice on Smoking and Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Rebecca BunnellOffice on Smoking and Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Baoguang WangCenter for Tobacco Products, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
Hannah DayCenter for Tobacco Products, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
Benjamin ApelbergCenter for Tobacco Products, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
Lee CantrellCalifornia Poison Control System-San Diego Division, San Diego, CA, USA.
Howell FosterArkansas Poison Control Center, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Joshua G SchierDivision of Environmental Hazards and Health Effects, National Center for Environmental Health, CDC, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Funding

Veterinary Student Research TrainingT35OD010991 · OD · TEXAS A&M AGRILIFE RESEARCH · PI GADDY, DANA · 2012 to 2025
$920k
NIH HHS T35 OD010991
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionE-cigarette use is increasing, and the long-term impact on public health is unclear. We described the acute adverse health effects from e-cigarette exposures reported to U.S. poison centers.

methodsWe compared monthly counts and demographic, exposure, and health effects data of calls about e-cigarettes and conventional cigarettes made to poison centers from September 2010 through December 2014.

resultsMonthly e-cigarette calls increased from 1 in September 2010, peaked at 401 in April 2014, and declined to 295 in December 2014. Monthly conventional cigarette calls during the same period ranged from 302 to 514. E-cigarette calls were more likely than conventional cigarette calls to report adverse health effects, including vomiting, eye irritation, and nausea. Five e-cigarette calls reported major health effects, such as respiratory failure, and there were two deaths associated with e-cigarette calls.

conclusionE-cigarette calls to U.S. poison centers increased over the study period, and were more likely than conventional cigarettes to report adverse health effects. It is important for health care providers and the public to be aware of potential acute health effects from e-cigarettes. Developing strategies to monitor and prevent poisonings from these novel devices is critical.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsAdolescentAdultCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S.ChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHotlinesHumansInhalation ExposureMaleNicotinePoison Control CentersPublic HealthSmokingTime FactorsNicotineElectronic nicotine delivery systemsHealth effectsPoison centers

Identifiers

PMID27352081
PMCPMC5135675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.