Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27351978›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Faster but Less Careful Prehension in Presence of High, Rather than Low, Social Status Attendees.

Carlo Fantoni, Sara Rigutti, Valentina Piccoli, Elena Sommacal, Andrea Carnaghi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Carlo FantoniDepartment of Life Sciences, Psychology Unit "Gaetano Kanizsa", University of Trieste, Via Weiss 21, 34128, Trieste, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7749-1771
Sara RiguttiDepartment of Life Sciences, Psychology Unit "Gaetano Kanizsa", University of Trieste, Via Weiss 21, 34128, Trieste, Italy.
Valentina PiccoliDepartment of Life Sciences, Psychology Unit "Gaetano Kanizsa", University of Trieste, Via Weiss 21, 34128, Trieste, Italy.
Elena SommacalDepartment of Life Sciences, Psychology Unit "Gaetano Kanizsa", University of Trieste, Via Weiss 21, 34128, Trieste, Italy.
Andrea CarnaghiDepartment of Life Sciences, Psychology Unit "Gaetano Kanizsa", University of Trieste, Via Weiss 21, 34128, Trieste, Italy.
University of Trieste · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ample evidence attests that social intention, elicited through gestures explicitly signaling a request of communicative intention, affects the patterning of hand movement kinematics. The current study goes beyond the effect of social intention and addresses whether the same action of reaching to grasp an object for placing it in an end target position within or without a monitoring attendee's peripersonal space, can be moulded by pure social factors in general, and by social facilitation in particular. A motion tracking system (Optotrak Certus) was used to record motor acts. We carefully avoided the usage of communicative intention by keeping constant both the visual information and the positional uncertainty of the end target position, while we systematically varied the social status of the attendee (a high, or a low social status) in separated blocks. Only thirty acts performed in the presence of a different social status attendee, revealed a significant change of kinematic parameterization of hand movement, independently of the attendee's distance. The amplitude of peak velocity reached by the hand during the reach-to-grasp and the lift-to-place phase of the movement was larger in the high rather than in the low social status condition. By contrast, the deceleration time of the reach-to-grasp phase and the maximum grasp aperture was smaller in the high rather than in the low social status condition. These results indicated that the hand movement was faster but less carefully shaped in presence of a high, but not of a low social status attendee. This kinematic patterning suggests that being monitored by a high rather than a low social status attendee might lead participants to experience evaluation apprehension that informs the control of motor execution. Motor execution would rely more on feedforward motor control in the presence of a high social status human attendee, vs. feedback motor control, in the presence of a low social status attendee.

Indexed as

MovementSocial ClassSocial FacilitationAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaHandHand StrengthHumansMaleRandom Allocation

Identifiers

PMID27351978
PMCPMC4924863
OpenAlexW2466974562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.