SynthesisSchmerz (Berlin, Germany)2016
[Pain registries and similar data collections : A systematic review].
Synthesis in Schmerz (Berlin, Germany), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A scoping review on the characteristics of chronic pain registries.Pain reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRegistries and similar data collections are a valuable addition to prospective studies as they provide data from real life treatment. In pain medicine only few such data collections exist so far.
objectiveAim of the study was to identify German-language registries or similar data collections that record patient-reported and pain-associated outcomes together with other data. MATERIAL AND
methodsA systematic search was carried out, which included the following sources: the data bases PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase, the German Registry for Clinical Trials (DRKS), ClinicalTrials.gov and registry portals known to us. Furthermore, an extended internet search was carried out via Google Scholar. References from personal scientific contacts and from operators of registries were also included. Questionnaires regarding registry items were sent to registry operators.
resultsOut of 381 search hits, 37 potentially relevant projects received a questionnaire and 35 answered. From the 35 responders 23 registries or similar data collections fulfilling inclusion criteria could be identified: 5 primarily pain-associated, 3 therapy-associated, 2 population-associated and 13 disease-associated (rheumatism/arthritis 5, joints/spine 4, hernias 1 and cancer 3).
conclusionThe reader obtains contact information on relevant data collections associated with pain, the contents, objectives and the pain assessment instruments applied. This review could give an important impulse for increased networking in health services research on pain. A limitation of the study was that identification of registries was made difficult due to an inconsistent definition and application of the term "registry", incomplete or insufficiently updated registry portals, missing scientific publications as well as two non-responders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27351756What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.