Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27351747›Full record

ReviewWiley interdisciplinary reviews. Developmental biology2016

A fly's view of neuronal remodeling.

Shiri P Yaniv, Oren Schuldiner

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Developmental biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Sequential formation ofScience advances · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. ALife science alliance · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Future avenues inLearning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shiri P YanivDept of Molecular Cell Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.
Oren SchuldinerDept of Molecular Cell Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.
Weizmann Institute of Science · IL

Funding

European Research Council 615906
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Developmental neuronal remodeling is a crucial step in sculpting the final and mature brain connectivity in both vertebrates and invertebrates. Remodeling includes degenerative events, such as neurite pruning, that may be followed by regeneration to form novel connections during normal development. Drosophila provides an excellent model to study both steps of remodeling since its nervous system undergoes massive and stereotypic remodeling during metamorphosis. Although pruning has been widely studied, our knowledge of the molecular and cellular mechanisms is far from complete. Our understanding of the processes underlying regrowth is even more fragmentary. In this review, we discuss recent progress by focusing on three groups of neurons that undergo stereotypic pruning and regrowth during metamorphosis, the mushroom body γ neurons, the dendritic arborization neurons and the crustacean cardioactive peptide peptidergic neurons. By comparing and contrasting the mechanisms involved in remodeling of these three neuronal types, we highlight the common themes and differences as well as raise key questions for future investigation in the field. WIREs Dev Biol 2016, 5:618-635. doi: 10.1002/wdev.241 For further resources related to this article, please visit the WIREs website.

Indexed as

AnimalsDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsMetamorphosis, BiologicalNeurogenesisNeuronsDrosophila Proteins

Identifiers

PMID27351747
PMCPMC5086085
OpenAlexW2460443618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.