Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27351663›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2017

Ablation of residual gastric tumor by argon plasma coagulation after endoscopic resection.

Sooyeon Oh, Sang Gyun Kim, Ji Min Choi, Eun Hyo Jin, Jee Hyun Kim, Jong Pil Im, Joo Sung Kim, Hyun Chae Jung

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Clinical Practice Guideline for Endoscopic Resection of Early Gastrointestinal Cancer].The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2020
    Guideline
  2. Pathologic Validation of Endoscopic Ablative Therapy for Gastric Epithelial Neoplasia: A Randomized Controlled Trial.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2021
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sooyeon OhDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Daehangno 101, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 110-744, Republic of Korea.
Sang Gyun KimDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Daehangno 101, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 110-744, Republic of Korea. harley1333@hanmail.net.
Ji Min ChoiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Healthcare Research Institute, Healthcare System Gangnam Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Eun Hyo JinDepartment of Internal Medicine, Healthcare Research Institute, Healthcare System Gangnam Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jee Hyun KimDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Daehangno 101, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 110-744, Republic of Korea.
Jong Pil ImDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Daehangno 101, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 110-744, Republic of Korea.
Joo Sung KimDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Daehangno 101, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 110-744, Republic of Korea.
Hyun Chae JungDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Daehangno 101, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 110-744, Republic of Korea.
Seoul National University · KRSeoul National University Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor residual gastric tumors (RT) found at the treated sites after endoscopic resections (ER), additional treatment options are additional ER, surgery or argon plasma coagulation (APC). Long-term efficacy of APC as the curative modality for RT has not been fully elucidated. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and long-term outcome of APC for RT with relevant tumor factors.

methodsEighty-two patients who received ER for gastric adenocarcinoma or adenoma and were subsequently treated with APC for RT were reviewed retrospectively. Characteristics of the tumors curatively ablated with single-session of APC and the non-curatively ablated were compared by multiple logistic regression analysis. Overall rate of curative ablation and follow-up duration was calculated.

resultsInitial tumor size <20 mm [odds ratio for second residual recurrence (OR) 0.16; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.039-0.63], en-bloc resection (OR 0.16; 95 % CI 0.039-0.72), histologic complete resection (OR 0.14; 95 % CI 0.028-0.66) and RT with flat or depressed type (OR 0.20; 95 % CI 0.051-0.77) were significantly associated with curative ablation of RT by single-session of APC. Anterior wall or lesser curvature location showed a tendency toward curative APC, but not reached statistical significance (OR 0.36; 95 % CI 0.11-1.16). A total of 60 patients (73.2 %) achieved curative ablation after single-session of APC. Eleven among the patients (n = 22) with second or more residual recurrence achieved curative ablation with one or two more additional sessions of APC. Overall rate of curative ablation was 86.6 % (71/82). From the last APC, the final curative ablation group (n = 71) has been followed up for 49.7 ± 37.4 months.

conclusionsEn-bloc resection, histologic complete resection, RT with flat or depressed type and initial tumor size less than 2 cm can be predictors of favorable clinical outcome of APC as an additional treatment for RT. For selected patients with RT, APC and close monitoring could be a reasonable alternative to immediate resection.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdenomaAgedArgon Plasma CoagulationFemaleGastroscopyHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm, ResidualOdds RatioRetrospective StudiesStomach NeoplasmsTreatment OutcomeArgon plasma coagulationEndoscopic resectionGastric cancerResidual tumor

Identifiers

PMID27351663
OpenAlexW2470667493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.