Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27351617›Full record

ArticleZebrafish2016

Maintenance of Zebrafish Lines at the European Zebrafish Resource Center.

Robert Geisler, Nadine Borel, Marco Ferg, Jana Viktoria Maier, Uwe Strähle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Zebrafish, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Robert GeislerInstitute of Toxicology and Genetics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) , Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany .
Nadine BorelInstitute of Toxicology and Genetics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) , Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany .
Marco FergInstitute of Toxicology and Genetics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) , Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany .
Jana Viktoria MaierInstitute of Toxicology and Genetics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) , Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany .
Uwe SträhleInstitute of Toxicology and Genetics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) , Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany .

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have established a European Zebrafish Resource Center (EZRC) at the KIT. This center not only maintains and distributes a large number of existing mutant and transgenic zebrafish lines but also gives zebrafish researchers access to screening services and technologies such as imaging and high-throughput sequencing, provided by the Institute of Toxicology and Genetics (ITG). The EZRC maintains and distributes the stock collection of the Nüsslein-Volhard laboratory, comprising over 2000 publicly released mutations, as frozen sperm samples. Within the framework of the ZF-HEALTH EU project, the EZRC distributes over 10,000 knockout mutations from the Sanger Institute (United Kingdom), as well as over 100 mutant and transgenic lines from other sources. In this article, we detail the measures we have taken to ensure the health of our fish, including hygiene, quarantine, and veterinary inspections.

Indexed as

Animals, Genetically ModifiedAnimals, LaboratoryZebrafishAnimal HusbandryAnimalsAquacultureEuropeModels, Animal

Identifiers

PMID27351617
PMCPMC4931740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.