Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27351490›Full record

ArticleMicrobial drug resistance (Larchmont, N.Y.)2016

LytM Fusion with SH3b-Like Domain Expands Its Activity to Physiological Conditions.

Elzbieta Jagielska, Olga Chojnacka, Izabela Sabała

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial drug resistance (Larchmont, N.Y.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Structural Characterization of EnpA D,L-Endopeptidase fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  12. Pharmaceutics · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elzbieta JagielskaInternational Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology in Warsaw , Warsaw, Poland .
Olga ChojnackaInternational Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology in Warsaw , Warsaw, Poland .
Izabela SabałaInternational Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology in Warsaw , Warsaw, Poland .
International Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Staphylococcus aureus remains one of the most common and at the same time the most dangerous bacteria. The spreading antibiotic resistance calls for intensification of research on staphylococcal physiology and development of new strategies for combating this threatening pathogen. We have engineered new chimeric enzymes comprising the enzymatically active domain (EAD) of autolysin LytM from S. aureus and the cell wall binding domain (CBD) from bacteriocin lysostaphin. They display potent activity in extended environmental conditions. Our results exemplify the possibility of exploring autolytic enzymes in engineering lysins with desired features. Moreover, they suggest a possible mechanism of autolysin physiological activity regulation by local ionic environments in the cell wall.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial ProteinsCell WallEndopeptidasesGene ExpressionLysostaphinMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMutationProtein DomainsProtein EngineeringRecombinant Fusion ProteinsStaphylococcus aureusStructure-Activity RelationshipAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial ProteinsEndopeptidasesLysostaphinLytM protein, Staphylococcus aureusRecombinant Fusion Proteins

Identifiers

PMID27351490
PMCPMC5036312
OpenAlexW2464683629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.