Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27351484›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Myc and Fgf Are Required for Zebrafish Neuromast Hair Cell Regeneration.

Sang Goo Lee, Mingqian Huang, Nikolaus D Obholzer, Shan Sun, Wenyan Li, Marco Petrillo, Pu Dai, Yi Zhou, Douglas A Cotanche, Sean G Megason and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Manipulating Myc for reparative regeneration.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Sang Goo LeeDepartment of Otolaryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0024-9266
Mingqian HuangDepartment of Otolaryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0870-9199
Nikolaus D ObholzerDepartment of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Shan SunDepartment of Otolaryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Wenyan LiDepartment of Otolaryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Marco PetrilloDepartment of Otolaryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Pu DaiDepartment of Otolaryngology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yi ZhouStem Cell Program and Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Children's Hospital Boston and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Douglas A CotancheCell and Developmental Biology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Sean G MegasonDepartment of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Huawei LiDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Shanghai Eye and ENT Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Zheng-Yi ChenDepartment of Otolaryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.

Funding

Hair Cell DevelopmentR01DC006908 · NIDCD · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI CHEN, ZHENG-YI · 2005 to 2015
$2.7M
In toto imaging and genomics to decode ear hair cell formation and regenerationR01DC010791 · NIDCD · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI MEGASON, SEAN G · 2010 to 2014
$2.1M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC006908NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC010791
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unlike mammals, the non-mammalian vertebrate inner ear can regenerate the sensory cells, hair cells, either spontaneously or through induction after hair cell loss, leading to hearing recovery. The mechanisms underlying the regeneration are poorly understood. By microarray analysis on a chick model, we show that chick hair cell regeneration involves the activation of proliferation genes and downregulation of differentiation genes. Both MYC and FGF are activated in chick hair cell regeneration. Using a zebrafish lateral line neuromast hair cell regeneration model, we show that the specific inhibition of Myc or Fgf suppresses hair cell regeneration, demonstrating that both pathways are essential to the process. Rapid upregulation of Myc and delayed Fgf activation during regeneration suggest a role of Myc in proliferation and Fgf in differentiation. The dorsal-ventral pattern of fgfr1a in the neuromasts overlaps with the distribution of hair cell precursors. By laser ablation, we show that the fgfr1a-positive supporting cells are likely the hair cell precursors that directly give rise to new hair cells; whereas the anterior-posterior fgfr1a-negative supporting cells have heightened proliferation capacity, likely to serve as more primitive progenitor cells to replenish lost precursors after hair cell loss. Thus fgfr1a is likely to mark compartmentalized supporting cell subtypes with different capacities in renewal proliferation and hair cell regeneration. Manipulation of c-MYC and FGF pathways could be explored for mammalian hair cell regeneration.

Indexed as

RegenerationAnimalsCell ProliferationFibroblast Growth FactorsLateral Line SystemMast CellsNeurons, AfferentProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycReceptors, Fibroblast Growth FactorZebrafishZebrafish ProteinsFibroblast Growth FactorsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycReceptors, Fibroblast Growth FactorZebrafish Proteins

Identifiers

PMID27351484
PMCPMC4924856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.