Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27351374›Full record

ArticleACS nano2016

Molecular Engineering of Acoustic Protein Nanostructures.

Anupama Lakshmanan, Arash Farhadi, Suchita P Nety, Audrey Lee-Gosselin, Raymond W Bourdeau, David Maresca, Mikhail G Shapiro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS nano, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 88 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Chemical reviews · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Binding Affinities of Serum Proteins to Nanoparticles.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2025
    Article
  10. Acoustic percolation switches enable targeted drug delivery controlled by diagnostic ultrasound.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. UltrasensitiveAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Pressure estimation of ultra-high frequency ultrasound using gas vesicles.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2024
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anupama LakshmananDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, ‡Division of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California-91125, United States.
Arash FarhadiDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, ‡Division of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California-91125, United States.
Suchita P NetyDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, ‡Division of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California-91125, United States.
Audrey Lee-GosselinDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, ‡Division of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California-91125, United States.
Raymond W BourdeauDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, ‡Division of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California-91125, United States.
David MarescaDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, ‡Division of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California-91125, United States.
Mikhail G ShapiroDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, ‡Division of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California-91125, United States.

Funding

Biogenic Gas Nanostructures As Molecular Imaging Reporters For UltrasoundR01EB018975 · NIBIB · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI Mikhail Shapiro · 2014 to 2026
$5.9M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB018975
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ultrasound is among the most widely used biomedical imaging modalities, but has limited ability to image specific molecular targets due to the lack of suitable nanoscale contrast agents. Gas vesicles-genetically encoded protein nanostructures isolated from buoyant photosynthetic microbes-have recently been identified as nanoscale reporters for ultrasound. Their unique physical properties give gas vesicles significant advantages over conventional microbubble contrast agents, including nanoscale dimensions and inherent physical stability. Furthermore, as a genetically encoded material, gas vesicles present the possibility that the nanoscale mechanical, acoustic, and targeting properties of an imaging agent can be engineered at the level of its constituent proteins. Here, we demonstrate that genetic engineering of gas vesicles results in nanostructures with new mechanical, acoustic, surface, and functional properties to enable harmonic, multiplexed, and multimodal ultrasound imaging as well as cell-specific molecular targeting. These results establish a biomolecular platform for the engineering of acoustic nanomaterials.

Indexed as

AcousticsNanostructuresUltrasonographyContrast MediaMicrobubblesProteinsContrast MediaProteinsacoustic nanostructurescancercontrast agentsgas vesiclesgenetic engineeringmacrophagesmolecular imagingprotein engineeringultrasound

Identifiers

PMID27351374
PMCPMC6058967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.