SynthesisOncotarget2016
Vascular endothelial growth factor polymorphisms are associated with osteosarcoma susceptibility.
Synthesis in Oncotarget, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genetic variants associated with osteosarcoma risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2024Pooled it
- Systematic meta-analysis of genetic variants associated with osteosarcoma susceptibility.Medicine · 2018Pooled it
- ROLE OF POLYMORPHISMS IN VEGF AND KDR GENES IN OSTEOSARCOMA SUSCEPTIBILITY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW.Acta ortopedica brasileira · 2025Review
- Article
- Role of VEGFs/VEGFR-1 Signaling and its Inhibition in Modulating Tumor Invasion: Experimental Evidence in Different Metastatic Cancer Models.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Upregulation of ATG4A promotes osteosarcoma cell epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition through the Notch signaling pathway.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Polymorphisms in the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) gene may contribute to osteosarcoma risk, but the results of previous studies have been inconsistent and inconclusive. We conducted a meta-analysis to assess this association more accurately. Relevant studies were collected systemically from three online English databases. Crude odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the strength of the associations of three VEGF gene polymorphisms (+936C/T, -634 G/C, +1612 G/A) with osteosarcoma risk. Seven case-control studies involving 1,350 cases and 1,706 controls were selected for the meta-analysis. The pooled OR indicated that the VEGF +936C/T polymorphism was associated with increased risk of osteosarcoma in a Chinese population (T vs. C: OR = 1.26, 95% CI = 1.12-1.42, P < 0.01; TT vs. CC: OR = 1.70, 95% CI = 1.29-2.24, P < 0.01; CT + TT vs. CC: OR = 1.23, 95% CI = 1.06-1.44, P < 0.01; TT vs. CC + CT: OR = 1.61, 95% CI = 1.23-2.10, P < 0.01). A significant association was also found between the -634 G/C polymorphism and osteosarcoma risk (C vs. G: OR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.69-0.96, P = 0.01; CC vs. GG: OR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.48-0.90, P < 0.01; GC + CC vs. GG: OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.67-0.96, P = 0.02; CC vs. GG + GC: OR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.60-0.86, P < 0.01). In sum, our meta-analysis suggests VEGF polymorphisms are associated with osteosarcoma susceptibility in the Chinese population. However, further studies that include different ethnicities and larger populations are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.