Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27351214›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2016

Dual CCNE1/PIK3CA targeting is synergistic in CCNE1-amplified/PIK3CA-mutated uterine serous carcinomas in vitro and in vivo.

Emiliano Cocco, Salvatore Lopez, Jonathan Black, Stefania Bellone, Elena Bonazzoli, Federica Predolini, Francesca Ferrari, Carlton L Schwab, Gulden Menderes, Luca Zammataro and 12 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Genomic Landscape of ctDNA and Real-World Outcomes in Advanced Endometrial Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024
    Article
  4. Targeting CDK2 to combat drug resistance in cancer therapy.Future oncology (London, England) · 2024
    Review
  5. Integrated mutational landscape analysis of poorly differentiated high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma of the uterine cervix.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. CDK9 inhibitors in cancer research.RSC medicinal chemistry · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Emiliano CoccoDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, Room 305 LSOG, 333 Cedar Street, PO Box 208063, New Haven, CT 06520-8063, USA.
Salvatore LopezDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Via Alvaro del Portillo 21, 00128 Rome, Italy.
Jonathan BlackDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, Room 305 LSOG, 333 Cedar Street, PO Box 208063, New Haven, CT 06520-8063, USA.
Stefania BelloneDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, Room 305 LSOG, 333 Cedar Street, PO Box 208063, New Haven, CT 06520-8063, USA.
Elena BonazzoliDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, Room 305 LSOG, 333 Cedar Street, PO Box 208063, New Haven, CT 06520-8063, USA.
Federica PredoliniDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, Room 305 LSOG, 333 Cedar Street, PO Box 208063, New Haven, CT 06520-8063, USA.
Francesca FerrariDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, Room 305 LSOG, 333 Cedar Street, PO Box 208063, New Haven, CT 06520-8063, USA.
Carlton L SchwabDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, Room 305 LSOG, 333 Cedar Street, PO Box 208063, New Haven, CT 06520-8063, USA.
Gulden MenderesDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, Room 305 LSOG, 333 Cedar Street, PO Box 208063, New Haven, CT 06520-8063, USA.
Luca ZammataroDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, Room 305 LSOG, 333 Cedar Street, PO Box 208063, New Haven, CT 06520-8063, USA.
Natalia BuzaDepartment of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
Pei HuiDepartment of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
Serena WongDepartment of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
Siming ZhaoDepartment of Genetics, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
Yalai BaiDepartment of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
David L RimmDepartment of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
Elena RatnerDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, Room 305 LSOG, 333 Cedar Street, PO Box 208063, New Haven, CT 06520-8063, USA.
Babak LitkouhiDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, Room 305 LSOG, 333 Cedar Street, PO Box 208063, New Haven, CT 06520-8063, USA.
Dan-Arin SilasiDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, Room 305 LSOG, 333 Cedar Street, PO Box 208063, New Haven, CT 06520-8063, USA.
Masoud AzodiDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, Room 305 LSOG, 333 Cedar Street, PO Box 208063, New Haven, CT 06520-8063, USA.
Peter E SchwartzDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, Room 305 LSOG, 333 Cedar Street, PO Box 208063, New Haven, CT 06520-8063, USA.
Alessandro D SantinDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, Room 305 LSOG, 333 Cedar Street, PO Box 208063, New Haven, CT 06520-8063, USA.
Yale University · USUniversità Campus Bio-Medico · IT

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Yale Pathology Tissue Services Shared ResourceP30CA016359 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI DAVID L RIMM · 1985 to 2026
$85.0M
Integrated genomic analysis of racial disparities in endometrial cancerU01CA176067 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI SANTIN, ALESSANDRO D · 2014 to 2018
$1.7M
CPE Peptide-Based Nanoparticles for the Diagnosis and Therapy of Chemotherapy ResR01CA154460 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI SANTIN, ALESSANDRO D · 2011 to 2015
$1.7M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016359NCI NIH HHS R01 CA154460NCI NIH HHS U01 CA176067
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical options for patients harbouring advanced/recurrent uterine serous carcinoma (USC), an aggressive variant of endometrial tumour, are very limited. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) data recently demonstrated that cyclin E1 (CCNE1) gene amplification and pik3ca driver mutations are common in USC and may therefore represent ideal therapeutic targets.

methodsCyclin E1 expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry (IHC) on 95 USCs. The efficacy of the cyclin-dependent kinase 2/9 inhibitor CYC065 was assessed on multiple primary USC cell lines with or without CCNE1 amplification. Cell-cycle analyses and knockdown experiments were performed to assess CYC065 targeting specificity. Finally, the in vitro and in vivo activity of CYC065, Taselisib (a PIK3CA inhibitor) and their combinations was tested on USC xenografts derived from CCNE1-amplified/pik3ca-mutated USCs.

resultsWe found that 89.5% of the USCs expressed CCNE1. CYC065 blocked cells in the G1 phase of the cell cycle and inhibited cell growth specifically in CCNE1-overexpressing USCs. Cyclin E1 knockdown conferred increased resistance to CYC065, whereas CYC065 treatment of xenografts derived from CCNE1-amplified USCs significantly reduced tumour growth. The combination of CYC065 and Taselisib demonstrated synergistic effect in vitro and was significantly more effective than single-agent treatment in decreasing tumour growth in xenografts of CCNE1-amplified/pik3ca-mutated USCs.

conclusionsDual CCNE1/PIK3CA blockade may represent a novel therapeutic option for USC patients harbouring recurrent CCNE1-amplified/pi3kca-mutated tumours.

Indexed as

MutationAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsCell Line, TumorClass I Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesCyclin EDNA Copy Number VariationsFemaleGene Knockdown TechniquesHeterograftsHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceIn Vitro TechniquesMiceOncogene ProteinsPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesAntineoplastic AgentsCCNE1 protein, humanClass I Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesCyclin EOncogene ProteinsPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesPIK3CA protein, humanRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID27351214
PMCPMC4973158
OpenAlexW2467143316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.