Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27351194›Full record

ArticleAIDS and behavior2017

The "Safe Sex" Conundrum: Anticipated Stigma From Sexual Partners as a Barrier to PrEP Use Among Substance Using MSM Engaging in Transactional Sex.

Katie B Biello, Catherine E Oldenburg, Jennifer A Mitty, Elizabeth F Closson, Kenneth H Mayer, Steven A Safren, Matthew J Mimiaga

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS and behavior, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Katie B BielloDepartments of Epidemiology and Behavioral & Social Health Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA. katie_biello@brown.edu.
Catherine E OldenburgDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Jennifer A MittyDepartment of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Elizabeth F ClossonThe Fenway Institute, Fenway Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Kenneth H MayerThe Fenway Institute, Fenway Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Steven A SafrenDepartment of Psychology, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
Matthew J MimiagaDepartments of Epidemiology and Behavioral & Social Health Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA.

Funding

The impact of HIV viral diversity and cellular immunity on HIV pathogenesisP30AI060354 · NIAID · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI ROBERT A. PARKER · 2004 to 2026
$94.4M
Addressing psychosocial comorbidities in HIV treatment and preventionK24DA040489 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI CORAL GABLES · PI SAFREN, STEVEN A · 2016 to 2020
$931k
Addressing psychosocial comorbidities in HIV treatment and preventionK24MH094214 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI CORAL GABLES · PI SAFREN, STEVEN A · 2011 to 2015
$858k
Understanding PrEP Implementation Among Club Drug Using Men Who Have Sex With MenR21MH095535 · NIMH · FENWAY COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER · PI MIMIAGA, MATTHEW JAMES, MITTY, JENNIFER A · 2011 to 2012
$452k
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI060354NIDA NIH HHS K24 DA040489NIMH NIH HHS K24 MH094214NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH095535
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is efficacious for HIV prevention when taken consistently; however, barriers to PrEP use are poorly understood among individuals who could benefit from PrEP, including men who have sex with men (MSM) who engage in transactional sex (i.e., sex exchanged for money or drugs). Two hundred and thirty-seven HIV-uninfected, PrEP-naive MSM reporting concurrent substance dependence and sexual risk completed a questionnaire on PrEP use barriers. Barriers to PrEP use for MSM who engaged in recent transactional sex (22 %) versus those who had not were compared using an ecological framework. Individual (e.g., HIV stigma, substance use) and structural (e.g., economic, healthcare) barriers did not differ (p > 0.05). MSM who recently engaged in transactional sex were more likely to report that anticipated stigma from primary and casual partners would be barriers to PrEP use. Assessing recent transactional sex may help identify men who may need additional counseling to avoid anticipated stigma so they can integrate PrEP into their lives.

Indexed as

Pre-Exposure ProphylaxisSexual and Gender MinoritiesSexual PartnersSex WorkSocial StigmaSubstance-Related DisordersAdultBisexualityCross-Sectional StudiesHIV InfectionsHomosexuality, MaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CareSafe SexHIVMen who have sex with menPre-exposure prophylaxisPrevention

Identifiers

PMID27351194
PMCPMC5624223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.