Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27351023›Full record

ArticleeNeuro

Differential Electrophysiological Responses to Odorant Isotopologues in Drosophilid Antennae.

Efstathia Drimyli, Alexandros Gaitanidis, Klio Maniati, Luca Turin, Efthimios M C Skoulakis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Experimental evaluation of the generalized vibrational theory of G protein-coupled receptor activation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Quantum effects in biology: golden rule in enzymes, olfaction, photosynthesis and magnetodetection.Proceedings. Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2017
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Efstathia DrimyliDivision of Neuroscience, Biomedical Sciences Research Centre "Alexander Fleming," 16672 Vari, Greece; Department of Basic Sciences, School of Nursing, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece.
Alexandros GaitanidisDivision of Neuroscience, Biomedical Sciences Research Centre "Alexander Fleming," 16672 Vari, Greece.
Klio ManiatiDivision of Neuroscience, Biomedical Sciences Research Centre "Alexander Fleming," 16672 Vari, Greece; Department of Chemical Sciences, School of Chemical Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 15780 Athens, Greece.
Luca TurinDivision of Neuroscience, Biomedical Sciences Research Centre "Alexander Fleming," 16672 Vari, Greece; Institute of Theoretical Physics, Ulm University, 89073 Ulm, Germany.
Efthimios M C SkoulakisDivision of Neuroscience, Biomedical Sciences Research Centre "Alexander Fleming," 16672 Vari, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Olfaction presents the ultimate challenge to molecular recognition as thousands of molecules have to be recognized by far fewer olfactory receptors. We have presented evidence that Drosophila readily distinguish odorants based on their molecular vibrations using a battery of behavioral assays suggesting engagement of a molecular vibration-sensing component. Here we interrogate electrophysiologically the antennae of four Drosophilids and demonstrate conserved differential response amplitudes to aldehydes, alcohols, ketones, nitriles, and their deuterated isotopologues. Certain deuterated odorants evoked larger electroantennogram (EAG) amplitudes, while the response to the normal odorant was elevated in others. Significantly, benzonitrile isotopologues were not distinguishable as predicted. This suggests that isotopologue-specific EAG amplitudes result from differential activation of specific olfactory receptors. In support of this, odorants with as few as two deuteria evoke distinct EAG amplitudes from their normal isotopologues, and this is independent of the size of the deuterated molecule. Importantly, we find no evidence that these isotopologue-specific amplitudes depend on perireceptor mechanisms or other pertinent physical property of the deuterated odorants. Rather, our results strongly suggest that Drosophilid olfactory receptors are activated by molecular vibrations differentiating similarly sized and shaped odorants in vivo, yielding sufficient differential information to drive behavioral choices.

Indexed as

AnimalsArthropod AntennaeAvoidance LearningBiological EvolutionDiscrimination, PsychologicalDrosophilaFemaleHydrogenOdorantsOlfactory PerceptionOlfactory Receptor NeuronsPatch-Clamp TechniquesPattern Recognition, PhysiologicalSmellSpecies SpecificityHydrogenantennogramsDrosophilaisotopomersmolecular vibrationsolfactionolfactory receptors

Identifiers

PMID27351023
PMCPMC4913217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.