ArticleJournal of clinical and translational hepatology2016
Accessibility to Oral Antiviral Therapy for Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C in the United States.
Article in Journal of clinical and translational hepatology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of medical insurance access negotiation on the utilization of innovative anticancer drugs in China: an interrupted time series analysis.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Review
- "Sell an Ox" - The Price of Cure for Hepatitis C in Two Countries.International journal of health policy and management · 2020Article
- Article
- Monitoring the hepatitis C care cascade using administrative claims data.The American journal of managed care · 2018Article
- Increasing Access to Hepatitis C Virus Medications: A Program Model Using Patient Navigators and Specialty Pharmacy to Obtain Prior Authorization Approval.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2018Article
- Building a Hepatitis C Clinical Program: Strategies to Optimize Outcomes.Current treatment options in infectious diseases · 2018Review
- Eight-Week Outcomes of Ledipasvir/Sofosbuvir in Noncirrhotic Treatment-Naive Patients with Hepatitis C: Analysis of Pharmacy-Based Data.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2018Article
- Direct-Acting Antivirals Improve Access to Care and Cure for Patients With HIV and Chronic HCV Infection.Open forum infectious diseases · 2018Article
- Hepatitis C: Review of the Epidemiology, Clinical Care, and Continued Challenges in the Direct Acting Antiviral Era.Current epidemiology reports · 2017Article
- Hepatitis C Virus: A Review of Treatment Guidelines, Cost-effectiveness, and Access to Therapy.Journal of clinical and translational hepatology · 2016Review
- A Cost Reimbursement Model for Hepatitis C Treatment Care Coordination.Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMPArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background : Hepatitis C (HCV) direct acting antiviral agents (DAAs) are safe, effective, and tolerable. Most contraindications to interferon-based treatment are no long applicable. The aims of this study were to understand the predictors of approval to drug accessibility. Methods : We studied all consecutive patients with HCV prescribed DAAs between October 2014 and July 2015. Data on demographic, socio-economic status, comorbidities, baseline laboratory values, and assessment of liver disease severity, insurance, and specialty pharmacy type were collected. Multivariate analyses were performed to identify predictors of prescription approval. Results : In total, 410 patients were prescribed DAAs between October 2014 and July 2015. Of those, 332 (81%) patients were insurance approved for therapy. Of the 332 patients accepted, 251 were accepted after the first prescription attempt, and 38 were accepted after the second and third attempts. The number of attempts for the other 43 approved patients was unknown. Older age (p = 0.001), employment (p = 0.001), lack of comorbidities (p = 0.02), liver transplantation (p = 0.018), and advanced liver disease (p = 0.001) were more likely associated with obtaining approval. Household income was not associated with insurance approval. In the multivariate analysis, Medicare insurance (odds ratio [OR]) 2.67, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.96-7.20), lack of nonliver comorbidities (OR 2.72, 95% CI 1.35-5.43), and the presence of advanced liver disease (OR 1.82, 95% CI 1.04-3.24) independently predicted drug approval. Conclusion : Despite the availability of DAAs for HCV, barriers from insurance carriers continue to impair widespread use. Patients with advanced liver disease, Medicare, and without comorbidities are most likely to be insurance approved for DAAs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.