Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27350922›Full record

ArticleSpringerPlus2016

The choice of multi-beam IMRT for whole breast radiotherapy in early-stage right breast cancer.

Emel Haciislamoglu, Fatma Colak, Emine Canyilmaz, Ahmet Yasar Zengin, Ahmet Hakan Yilmaz, Adnan Yoney, Zumrut Bahat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SpringerPlus, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Emel HaciislamogluDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey.
Fatma ColakDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey.
Emine CanyilmazDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey.
Ahmet Yasar ZenginDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Kanuni Research and Education Hospital, Trabzon, Turkey.
Ahmet Hakan YilmazDepartment of Nuclear Physics, Faculty of Science, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey.
Adnan YoneyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey.
Zumrut BahatDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to identify a rational strategy for the selection of multi-beam IMRT in patients with right breast cancer through the comparison of dosimetric parameters of the planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OARs) using five different radiotherapy modalities. This was a retrospective study using computed tomography scans from ten patients with early-stage right breast cancer who had been treated previously. Three dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT), forward-planned IMRT (for-IMRT), inverse-planned IMRT (inv-IMRT), helical tomotherapy (HT), and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) were planned for each patient. The plans were compared according to dose-volume histogram analysis. The most significant impact of inverse-planned multi-beam modalities for right breast cancer was the reduction of Dmax, Dmean, V53.5 and prescribed dose volume (cc) outside of the PTV (breast) (OB-V50) of the PTV. HT decreased the ipsilateral OAR volumes receiving higher doses. In exchange, HT also increased the volumes receiving low doses, which is known to lead to an increased rate of radiation-induced secondary malignancies. The heart, LAD, and contralateral doses for 3DCRT and for-IMRT were significantly lower than those for inv-IMRT, HT, and VMAT. In addition, inv-IMRT demonstrated an increase in exposed volume of heart, LAD, ipsilateral lung, and contralateral lung compared with those parameters for HT or VMAT. Although it is known to reduce cardiac toxicity with breath hold technique in left sided breast cancer, similarly it is possible for 3DCRT and for-IMRT techniques in right sided breast cancer even in free breathing.

Indexed as

Doses to the heart and LADHelical tomotherapyMulti-beam inverse planningRight breast cancerVolumetric arc therapy

Identifiers

PMID27350922
PMCPMC4899391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.