Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27350555›Full record

ArticleDiagnostic pathology2016

Frequency of BRAF V600E mutations in 969 central nervous system neoplasms.

Felix Behling, Alonso Barrantes-Freer, Marco Skardelly, Maike Nieser, Arne Christians, Florian Stockhammer, Veit Rohde, Marcos Tatagiba, Christian Hartmann, Christine Stadelmann and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostic pathology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 112 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Recent Advances in Targeted Therapies for Adult Gliomas.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. A novel BRAF::PTPRN2 fusion in meningioma: a case report.Acta neuropathologica communications · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Felix BehlingDepartment of Neurosurgery, Eberhard-Karls University, Hoppe-Seyler Street 3, 72076, Tübingen, Germany. felix.behling@med.uni-tuebingen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1083-1276
Alonso Barrantes-FreerDepartment of Neuropathology, Georg-August University, Robert-Koch-Street 40, 37075, Göttingen, Germany.
Marco SkardellyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Eberhard-Karls University, Hoppe-Seyler Street 3, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Maike NieserDepartment of Pathology, Eberhard-Karls University, Liebermeisterstr. 8, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Arne ChristiansDepartment of Neuropathology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg Street 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Florian StockhammerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Städtisches Klinikum Dresden-Friedrichstadt, Friedrichstr. 41, 01067, Dresden, Germany.
Veit RohdeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Georg-August University, Robert-Koch-Street 40, 37075, Göttingen, Germany.
Marcos TatagibaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Eberhard-Karls University, Hoppe-Seyler Street 3, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Christian HartmannDepartment of Neuropathology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg Street 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Christine StadelmannDepartment of Neuropathology, Georg-August University, Robert-Koch-Street 40, 37075, Göttingen, Germany.
Jens SchittenhelmDepartment of Neuropathology, Eberhard-Karls University, Calwer Str. 3, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
University of Tübingen · DEUniversity of Göttingen · DEMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEStädtisches Klinikum Dresden · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTreatment options for oncological diseases have been enhanced by the advent of targeted therapies. The point mutation of the BRAF gene at codon 600 (BRAF V600E) is found in several tumor entities and can be approached with selective inhibitory antibodies. The BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib has demonstrated clinical efficacy in patients with BRAF V600E-mutant melanoma brain metastases and in other cancer diseases. Therefore the BRAF V600E mutation is a highly interesting oncological target in brain tumors.

methodsThis study assesses the BRAF V600E mutation status in 969 intracranial neoplasms using a tissue microarray method and immunohistochemical staining with the mutation-specific VE-1 antibody, followed by sequencing of positively stained cases.

resultsOut of 784 primary brain tumors seven cases with a BRAF V600E mutation were detected (7/784, 1 %). Six of these cases were neuroepithelial tumors (6/667, 1 %) encompassing 2 astrocytomas WHO grade II (2/42, 5 %), 1 gliosarcoma WHO grade IV (1/75, 1 %) and 3 glioblastomas WHO grade IV (3/312, 1 %). Interestingly, all three mutant glioblastomas showed epithelioid histopathological features. Patients with V600E mutated astrocytic tumors were significantly younger (mean age 15.3 years) than wildtype cases (58.2 years). Among three rhabdoid meningiomas, one case was mutated (1/3) while all other grade I-III meningiomas (1/116, 1 %) and all fifty vestibular schwannomas analyzed were of wildtype status. The vast majority of the BRAF V600E mutations were found in cerebral metastases of malignant melanomas and carcinomas (29/135, 22 %), with false-positive staining found in four breast cancer cases and two non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) samples.

conclusionsOur data suggest routine screening for BRAF V600E mutations for glioblastomas WHO grade IV below the age of 30, especially in glioblastomas with epithelioid features and in all rhabdoid meningiomas WHO grade III. For colorectal carcinoma, thyroid cancer, malignant melanoma and gliomas BRAF V600E immunostaining is sufficient for screening purposes. We also recommend routine immunohistochemical staining followed by sequencing validation in rare CNS metastases or metastases of unknown primary. Immunohistochemical analysis using mutation-specific antibodies on tissue microarrays is a feasible, time- and cost-efficient approach to high-throughput screening for specific mutations in large tumor series but sequencing validation is necessary in unexpected cases.

Indexed as

Point MutationAdolescentAdultAgedAge FactorsAstrocytomaBiomarkers, TumorCarcinomaCentral Nervous System NeoplasmsChildColorectal NeoplasmsCutaneous Malignant MelanomaGlioblastomaHumansMelanomaMiddle AgedBiomarkers, TumorBRAF protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafBRAF V600E mutationBrain tumorCerebral metastasesEpithelioid glioblastomaGlioblastomaGliosarcomaRhabdoid meningiomaTissue microarray

Identifiers

PMID27350555
PMCPMC4924254
OpenAlexW2468037274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.