Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27350359›Full record

SynthesisThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2016

Variation in population levels of physical activity in European adults according to cross-European studies: a systematic literature review within DEDIPAC.

Anne Loyen, Linde Van Hecke, Maïté Verloigne, Ingrid Hendriksen, Jeroen Lakerveld, Jostein Steene-Johannessen, Anne Vuillemin, Annemarie Koster, Alan Donnelly, Ulf Ekelund and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
11.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 146 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effectiveness of booster strategies to promote physical activity maintenance: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Comparing national device-based physical activity surveillance systems: a systematic review.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. The 2017 Dutch Physical Activity Guidelines.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2018
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 8 institutions in 6 countries.

Anne LoyenDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, De Boelelaan 1089a, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. a.loyen@vumc.nl.
Linde Van HeckeDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, De Pintelaan 185, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Maïté VerloigneDepartment of Movement and Sport Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Watersportlaan 2, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Ingrid HendriksenTNO Expertise Centre Lifestyle, Schipholweg 77-89, 2316 ZL, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Jeroen LakerveldDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, De Boelelaan 1089a, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jostein Steene-JohannessenDepartment of Sports Medicine, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Ullevål Stadion, PO Box 4014, 0806, Oslo, Norway.
Anne VuilleminFaculty of Sport Sciences, EA 4360 APEMAC, University of Lorraine, 30 rue du Jardin Botanique, CS 30156, 54600, Villers-lès-Nancy cedex, Nancy, France.
Annemarie KosterDepartment of Social Medicine, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, PO BOX 616, 6200MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Alan DonnellyDepartment of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Centre for Physical Activity and Health Research, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Ulf EkelundDepartment of Sports Medicine, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Ullevål Stadion, PO Box 4014, 0806, Oslo, Norway.
Benedicte DeforcheDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, De Pintelaan 185, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Ilse De BourdeaudhuijDepartment of Movement and Sport Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Watersportlaan 2, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Johannes BrugDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, De Boelelaan 1089a, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Hidde P van der PloegDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, VU University Medical Center, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
DEDIPAC consortium
Amsterdam Public Health · NLGhent University · BENorwegian School of Sport Sciences · NOVrije Universiteit Brussel · BEInterdisciplinarité en Santé Publique Interventions et Instruments de mesure complexes – Région Est · FRMaastricht University · NLThe University of Sydney · AUUniversity of Limerick · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhysical inactivity is a well-known public health risk that should be monitored at the population level. Physical activity levels are often surveyed across Europe. This systematic literature review aims to provide an overview of all existing cross-European studies that assess physical activity in European adults, describe the variation in population levels according to these studies, and discuss the impact of the assessment methods.

methodsSix literature databases (PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, SportDiscus and OpenGrey) were searched, supplemented with backward- and forward tracking and searching authors' and experts' literature databases. Articles were included if they reported on observational studies measuring total physical activity and/or physical activity in leisure time in the general population in two or more European countries. Each record was reviewed, extracted and assessed by two independent researchers and disagreements were resolved by a third researcher. The review protocol of this review is registered in the PROSPERO database under registration number CRD42014010334.

resultsOf the 9,756 unique identified articles, twenty-five were included in this review, reporting on sixteen different studies, including 2 to 35 countries and 321 to 274,740 participants. All but two of the studies used questionnaires to assess physical activity, with the majority of studies using the IPAQ-short questionnaire. The remaining studies used accelerometers. The percentage of participants who either were or were not meeting the physical activity recommendations was the most commonly reported outcome variable, with the percentage of participants meeting the recommendations ranging from 7% to 96% across studies and countries.

conclusionsThe included studies showed substantial variation in the assessment methods, reported outcome variables and, consequently, the presented physical activity levels. Because of this, absolute population levels of physical activity in European adults are currently unknown. However, when ranking countries, Ireland, Italy, Malta, Portugal, and Spain generally appear to be among the less active countries. Objective data of adults across Europe is currently limited. These findings highlight the need for standardisation of the measurement methods, as well as cross-European monitoring of physical activity levels.

Indexed as

ExercisePopulationAdultEthnicityEuropeHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesAdultsAssessment methodsEuropePhysical ActivityPrevalenceReview

Identifiers

PMID27350359
PMCPMC4924233
OpenAlexW2464280444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.