Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27350305›Full record

ArticleAIDS and behavior2017

Mixed-Method Quasi-Experimental Study of Outcomes of a Large-Scale Multilevel Economic and Food Security Intervention on HIV Vulnerability in Rural Malawi.

Lance S Weinhardt, Loren W Galvao, Alice F Yan, Patricia Stevens, Thokozani Ng'ombe Mwenyekonde, Emmanuel Ngui, Lindsay Emer, Katarina M Grande, Lucy Mkandawire-Valhmu, Susan C Watkins

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS and behavior, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lance S WeinhardtJoseph J Zilber School of Public Health, University of Wisconsin Milwaukee, PO Box 413, Milwaukee, WI, 53201, USA. weinhard@uwm.edu.
Loren W GalvaoCenter for Global Health Equity, College of Nursing, University of Wisconsin Milwaukee, PO Box 413, Milwaukee, WI, 53201-0413, USA.
Alice F YanJoseph J Zilber School of Public Health, University of Wisconsin Milwaukee, PO Box 413, Milwaukee, WI, 53201, USA. yanf@uwm.edu.
Patricia StevensCollege of Nursing, University of Wisconsin Milwaukee, PO Box 413, Milwaukee, WI, 53201-0413, USA.
Thokozani Ng'ombe MwenyekondeCARE-International Malawi, CARE House, Kenyatta Road, Capital City, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Emmanuel NguiJoseph J Zilber School of Public Health, University of Wisconsin Milwaukee, PO Box 413, Milwaukee, WI, 53201, USA.
Lindsay EmerJoseph J Zilber School of Public Health, University of Wisconsin Milwaukee, PO Box 413, Milwaukee, WI, 53201, USA.
Katarina M GrandeJoseph J Zilber School of Public Health, University of Wisconsin Milwaukee, PO Box 413, Milwaukee, WI, 53201, USA.
Lucy Mkandawire-ValhmuDepartment of Economics, Chancellor College, University of Malawi, P.O. Box 280, Zomba, Malawi.
Susan C WatkinsProfessor Emeritus of Sociology, University of Pennsylvania and Visiting Scholar, California Center for Population Research, University of California-Los Angeles, 4284 Public Affairs Bldg, PO Box 957236, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-7236, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of the Savings, Agriculture, Governance, and Empowerment for Health (SAGE4Health) study was to evaluate the impact of a large-scale multi-level economic and food security intervention on health outcomes and HIV vulnerability in rural Malawi. The study employed a quasi-experimental non-equivalent control group design to compare intervention participants (n = 598) with people participating in unrelated programs in distinct but similar geographical areas (control, n = 301). We conducted participant interviews at baseline, 18-, and 36-months on HIV vulnerability and related health outcomes, food security, and economic vulnerability. Randomly selected households (n = 1002) were interviewed in the intervention and control areas at baseline and 36 months. Compared to the control group, the intervention led to increased HIV testing (OR 1.90; 95 % CI 1.29-2.78) and HIV case finding (OR = 2.13; 95 % CI 1.07-4.22); decreased food insecurity (OR = 0.74; 95 % CI 0.63-0.87), increased nutritional diversity, and improved economic resilience to shocks. Most effects were sustained over a 3-year period. Further, no significant differences in change were found over the 3-year study period on surveys of randomly selected households in the intervention and control areas. Although there were general trends toward improvement in the study area, only intervention participants' outcomes were significantly better. Results indicate the intervention can improve economic and food security and HIV vulnerability through increased testing and case finding. Leveraging the resources of economic development NGOs to deliver locally-developed programs with scientific funding to conduct controlled evaluations has the potential to accelerate the scientific evidence base for the effects of economic development programs on health.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesModels, EconomicOutcome Assessment, Health CareRural PopulationAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAgricultureEconomicsFemaleFood SupplyHealth Plan ImplementationHealth Risk BehaviorsHIV InfectionsHumansFarmer field schoolsFood securityHIVMalawiMicrofinanceQuasi-experimentStructural interventionSustainable agriculture

Identifiers

PMID27350305
PMCPMC5306183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.