Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27350251›Full record

SynthesisThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2016

Variation in population levels of sedentary time in European adults according to cross-European studies: a systematic literature review within DEDIPAC.

Anne Loyen, Maïté Verloigne, Linde Van Hecke, Ingrid Hendriksen, Jeroen Lakerveld, Jostein Steene-Johannessen, Annemarie Koster, Alan Donnelly, Ulf Ekelund, Benedicte Deforche and 4 more

Abstract readComparative StudySystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Correlates of Sedentary Behaviour in Adults with Intellectual Disabilities-A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Anne LoyenDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, De Boelelaan 1089a, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. a.loyen@vumc.nl.
Maïté VerloigneDepartment of Movement and Sport Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Watersportlaan 2, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Linde Van HeckeDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, De Pintelaan 185, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Ingrid HendriksenTNO Expertise Centre Lifestyle, Schipholweg 77-89, 2316 ZL, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Jeroen LakerveldDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, De Boelelaan 1089a, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jostein Steene-JohannessenDepartment of Sports Medicine, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, PO Box 4014, 0806, Ullevål Stadion, Oslo, Norway.
Annemarie KosterDepartment of Social Medicine, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, PO BOX 616, 6200MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Alan DonnellyCentre for Physical Activity and Health Research, Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Ulf EkelundDepartment of Sports Medicine, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, PO Box 4014, 0806, Ullevål Stadion, Oslo, Norway.
Benedicte DeforcheDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, De Pintelaan 185, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Ilse De BourdeaudhuijDepartment of Movement and Sport Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Watersportlaan 2, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Johannes BrugDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, De Boelelaan 1089a, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Hidde P van der PloegDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, VU University Medical Center, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
DEDIPAC consortium

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSedentary behaviour is increasingly recognized as a public health risk that needs to be monitored at the population level. Across Europe, there is increasing interest in assessing population levels of sedentary time. This systematic literature review aims to provide an overview of all existing cross-European studies that measure sedentary time in adults, to describe the variation in population levels across these studies and to discuss the impact of assessment methods.

methodsSix literature databases (PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, SportDiscus and OpenGrey) were searched, supplemented with backward- and forward tracking and searching authors' and experts' literature databases. Articles were included if they reported on observational studies measuring any form of sedentary time in the general population in two or more European countries. Each record was reviewed, extracted and assessed by two independent researchers, and disagreements were resolved by a third researcher. The review protocol of this review is registered in the PROSPERO database under registration number CRD42014010335.

resultsOf the 9,756 unique articles that were identified in the search, twelve articles were eligible for inclusion in this review, reporting on six individual studies and three Eurobarometer surveys. These studies represented 2 to 29 countries, and 321 to 65,790 participants. Eleven studies focused on total sedentary time, while one studied screen time. The majority of studies used questionnaires to assess sedentary time, while two studies used accelerometers. Total sedentary time was reported most frequently and varied from 150 (median) to 620 (mean) minutes per day across studies and countries.

conclusionsOne third of European countries were not included in any of the studies. Objective measures of European adults are currently limited, and most studies used single-item self-reported questions without assessing sedentary behaviour types or domains. Findings varied substantially between studies, meaning that population levels of sedentary time in European adults are currently unknown. In general, people living in northern Europe countries appear to report more sedentary time than southern Europeans. The findings of this review highlight the need for standardisation of the measurement methods and the added value of cross-European surveillance of sedentary behaviour.

Indexed as

Cross-Cultural ComparisonEthnicityExerciseHealth BehaviorPublic HealthSedentary BehaviorAdultEuropeHumansAdultsAssessment methodsEuropePrevalenceReviewSedentary behaviour

Identifiers

PMID27350251
PMCPMC4924266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.