Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27350090›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Functional map of arrestin binding to phosphorylated opsin, with and without agonist.

Christian Peterhans, Ciara C M Lally, Martin K Ostermaier, Martha E Sommer, Jörg Standfuss

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Functional Role of Gate Loop Residues in Arrestin Binding to GPCRs.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Biological Role of Arrestin-1 Oligomerization.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Structure and dynamics of GPCR signaling complexes.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2018
    Review
  20. Arrestins: Introducing Signaling Bias Into Multifunctional Proteins.Progress in molecular biology and translational science · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Christian PeterhansPaul Scherrer Institute, Laboratory for Biomolecular Research, CH-5323, Villigen, Switzerland.
Ciara C M LallyInstitut für Medizinische Physik und Biophysik (CC2), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, D-10117, Berlin, Germany.
Martin K OstermaierInstitut für Medizinische Physik und Biophysik (CC2), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, D-10117, Berlin, Germany.
Martha E SommerInstitut für Medizinische Physik und Biophysik (CC2), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, D-10117, Berlin, Germany.
Jörg StandfussPaul Scherrer Institute, Laboratory for Biomolecular Research, CH-5323, Villigen, Switzerland.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEPaul Scherrer Institute · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Arrestins desensitize G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and act as mediators of signalling. Here we investigated the interactions of arrestin-1 with two functionally distinct forms of the dim-light photoreceptor rhodopsin. Using unbiased scanning mutagenesis we probed the individual contribution of each arrestin residue to the interaction with the phosphorylated apo-receptor (Ops-P) and the agonist-bound form (Meta II-P). Disruption of the polar core or displacement of the C-tail strengthened binding to both receptor forms. In contrast, mutations of phosphate-binding residues (phosphosensors) suggest the phosphorylated receptor C-terminus binds arrestin differently for Meta II-P and Ops-P. Likewise, mutations within the inter-domain interface, variations in the receptor-binding loops and the C-edge of arrestin reveal different binding modes. In summary, our results indicate that arrestin-1 binding to Meta II-P and Ops-P is similarly dependent on arrestin activation, although the complexes formed with these two receptor forms are structurally distinct.

Indexed as

Models, MolecularAnimalsArrestinCattleMutationOpsinsProtein BindingProtein DomainsArrestinOpsins

Identifiers

PMID27350090
PMCPMC4923902
OpenAlexW2470669072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.