Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27350043›Full record

SynthesisThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2016

Variation in population levels of sedentary time in European children and adolescents according to cross-European studies: a systematic literature review within DEDIPAC.

Maïté Verloigne, Anne Loyen, Linde Van Hecke, Jeroen Lakerveld, Ingrid Hendriksen, Ilse De Bourdheaudhuij, Benedicte Deforche, Alan Donnelly, Ulf Ekelund, Johannes Brug and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudySystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
21.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 174 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Assessment of Motor Abilities and Physical Fitness in Youth in the Context of Talent Identification-OSF Test.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Fitness, Fatness, and Academic Attainment in Male Schoolchildren from a Soccer Academy.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Changes in Physical Activity Patterns from Childhood to Adolescence: Genobox Longitudinal Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Co-creating a 24-hour movement behavior tool together with 9-12-year-old children using mixed-methods: MyDailyMoves.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Maïté VerloigneDepartment of Movement and Sports Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Watersportlaan 2, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Anne LoyenDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, De Boelelaan 1089a, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. a.loyen@vumc.nl.
Linde Van HeckeDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, De Pintelaan 185, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Jeroen LakerveldDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, De Boelelaan 1089a, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ingrid HendriksenTNO Expertise Centre Lifestyle, Schipholweg 77-89, 2316 ZL, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Ilse De BourdheaudhuijDepartment of Movement and Sports Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Watersportlaan 2, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Benedicte DeforcheDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, De Pintelaan 185, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Alan DonnellyCentre for Physical Activity and Health Research, Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Ulf EkelundDepartment of Sports Medicine, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, PO Box 4014, 0806, Ullevål Stadion, Oslo, Norway.
Johannes BrugDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, De Boelelaan 1089a, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Hidde P van der PloegDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, VU University Medical Center, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research · NLGhent University · BENorwegian School of Sport Sciences · NOUniversity of Limerick · IEVrije Universiteit Brussel · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA high amount of sedentary time has been proposed as a risk factor for various health outcomes in adults. While the evidence is less clear in children and adolescents, monitoring sedentary time is important to understand the prevalence rates and how this behaviour varies over time and by place. This systematic literature review aims to provide an overview of existing cross-European studies on sedentary time in children (0-12y) and adolescents (13-18y), to describe the variation in population levels of sedentary time, and to discuss the impact of assessment methods.

methodsSix literature databases were searched (PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, SportDiscus and OpenGrey), followed by backward- and forward tracking and searching authors' and experts' literature databases. Included articles were observational studies reporting on levels of sedentary time in the general population of children and/or adolescents in at least two European countries. Population levels were reported separately for children and adolescents. Data were reviewed, extracted and assessed by two researchers, with disagreements being resolved by a third researcher. The review protocol is published under registration number CRD42014013379 in the PROSPERO database.

resultsForty-two eligible articles were identified, most were cross-sectional (n = 38). The number of included European countries per article ranged from 2 to 36. Levels of sedentary time were observed to be higher in East-European countries compared to the rest of Europe. There was a large variation in assessment methods and reported outcome variables. The majority of articles used a child-specific questionnaire (60%). Other methods included accelerometers, parental questionnaires or interviews and ecological momentary assessment tools. Television time was reported as outcome variable in 57% of included articles (ranging from a mean value of 1 h to 2.7 h in children and 1.3 h to 4.4 h in adolescents), total sedentary time in 24 % (ranging from a mean value of 192 min to 552 min in children and from 268 min to 506 min in adolescents).

conclusionA substantial number of published studies report on levels of sedentary time in children and adolescents across European countries, but there was a large variation in assessment methods. Questionnaires (child specific) were used most often, but they mostly measured specific screen-based activities and did not assess total sedentary time. There is a need for harmonisation and standardisation of objective and subjective methods to assess sedentary time in children and adolescents to enable comparison across countries.

Indexed as

Adolescent BehaviorChild BehaviorCross-Cultural ComparisonEthnicityExerciseHealth BehaviorSedentary BehaviorAdolescentChildEuropeFemaleHumansMalePublic HealthTelevisionAssessment methodEuropeHealth behaviourPrevalenceYouth

Identifiers

PMID27350043
PMCPMC4924322
OpenAlexW2464283027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.