Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27349914›Full record

ArticleHearing research2016

Prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle reflex vs. auditory brainstem response for hearing assessment.

R J Longenecker, F Alghamdi, M J Rosen, A V Galazyuk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hearing research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Early-Life Stress Impairs Perception and Neural Encoding of Rapid Signals in the Auditory Pathway.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Does insular cortex lesion cause tinnitus in rats?Iranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Vesicular Glutamatergic Transmission in Noise-Induced Loss and Repair of Cochlear Ribbon Synapses.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Kv3 KNeuropharmacology · 2018
    Article
  19. Brief Stimulus Exposure Fully Remediates Temporal Processing Deficits Induced by Early Hearing Loss.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

R J LongeneckerNortheast Ohio Medical University, Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Rootstown, OH, USA. Electronic address: rlongenecker@neomed.edu.
F AlghamdiNortheast Ohio Medical University, Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Rootstown, OH, USA.
M J RosenNortheast Ohio Medical University, Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Rootstown, OH, USA.
A V GalazyukNortheast Ohio Medical University, Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Rootstown, OH, USA.
Northeast Ohio Medical University · US

Funding

Auditory Processing Deficits in Early-Onset Conductive Hearing LossR01DC013314 · NIDCD · NORTHEAST OHIO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY · PI ROSEN, MERRI J. · 2014 to 2024
$4.1M
Neural Mechanism Underlying Sound-Evoked Suppression of Tinnitus:Residual InhibitR01DC011330 · NIDCD · NORTHEAST OHIO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY · PI GALAZYUK, ALEXANDER · 2012 to 2016
$1.6M
Differential Pathologies Resulting from Sound Exposure: Tinnitus vs Hearing LossF31DC013498 · NIDCD · NORTHEAST OHIO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY · PI LONGENECKER, RYAN JAMES · 2013 to 2014
$53k
NIDCD NIH HHS F31 DC013498NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC011330NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC013314
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The high prevalence of noise-induced and age-related hearing loss in the general population has warranted the use of animal models to study the etiology of these pathologies. Quick and accurate auditory threshold determination is a prerequisite for experimental manipulations targeting hearing loss in animal models. The standard auditory brainstem response (ABR) measurement is fairly quick and translational across species, but is limited by the need for anesthesia and a lack of perceptual assessment. The goal of this study was to develop a new method of hearing assessment utilizing prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the acoustic startle reflex, a commonly used tool that measures detection thresholds in awake animals, and can be performed on multiple animals simultaneously. We found that in control mice PPI audiometric functions are similar to both ABR and traditional operant conditioning audiograms. The hearing thresholds assessed with PPI audiometry in sound exposed mice were also similar to those detected by ABR thresholds one day after exposure. However, three months after exposure PPI threshold shifts were still evident at and near the frequency of exposure whereas ABR thresholds recovered to the pre-exposed level. In contrast, PPI audiometry and ABR wave one amplitudes detected similar losses. PPI audiometry provides a high throughput automated behavioral screening tool of hearing in awake animals. Overall, PPI audiometry and ABR assessments of the auditory system are robust techniques with distinct advantages and limitations, which when combined, can provide ample information about the functionality of the auditory system.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAnimalsAudiometry, Pure-ToneAuditory ThresholdEvoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain StemHearingMaleMiceMice, Inbred CBAModels, AnimalNoisePrepulse InhibitionReflex, StartleAudiometric functionsHearing lossMousePermanent threshold shiftSound exposureTemporary threshold shift

Identifiers

PMID27349914
PMCPMC5018436
OpenAlexW2460054080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.