Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27349889›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2016

Similar efficacy of broad-range ITS PCR and conventional fungal culture for diagnosing fungal infections in non-immunocompromised patients.

Silvana K Rampini, Andrea Zbinden, Roberto F Speck, Guido V Bloemberg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Rapid molecular detection of airway pathogens in lung transplant recipients.Transplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation Society · 2021
    Observational
  7. Article
  8. Clinical Utility of Universal Broad-Range Polymerase Chain Reaction Amplicon Sequencing for Pathogen Identification: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Silvana K RampiniKlinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin, UniversitätsSpital Zürich, Universität Zürich, Rämistrasse 100, CH-8091, Zürich, Switzerland.
Andrea ZbindenInstitut für Medizinische Mikrobiologie, Universität Zürich, Gloriastrasse 30/32, CH-8006, Zürich, Switzerland.
Roberto F SpeckKlinik für Infektionskrankheiten und Spitalhygiene, UniversitätsSpital Zürich, Universität Zürich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zürich, Switzerland.
Guido V BloembergInstitut für Medizinische Mikrobiologie, Universität Zürich, Gloriastrasse 30/32, CH-8006, Zürich, Switzerland. guido.bloemberg@unilabs.com.
University of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBroad-range fungal inter spacer region (ITS) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has been evaluated for the detection and identification of fungi in clinical specimens from severely immunocompromised patients, but not in non-selected patients. Thus, the aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of ITS PCR with that of fungal culture and to investigate its clinical impact on the diagnosis of fungal infections in non-immunocompromised patients. The corresponding patients' data were retrieved by detailed medical chart reviews.

resultsResults from 251 specimens showed a high concordance of 89.6 % for ITS PCR and fungal culture. The analytical sensitivity and specificity of ITS PCR considering culture as gold standard were 87.7 and 90.3 %, respectively, the positive and negative predictive value (PPV and NPV) were 76 and 95.5 %, respectively. Assessing the clinical probability of a fungal infection based on detailed chart reviews, PCR had a clinical sensitivity of 88.9 %, a specificity of 86.3 %, a PPV of 64.0 % and a NPV of 96.6 %. The overall performance of fungal broad-range PCR was similar to that of culture.

conclusionsOur data show that, in non-selected and non-immunocompromised patients, the performance of ITS PCR is similar to that of culture for detecting fungal infections, not the least because sensitivity of culture in patients under antifungal treatment is surprisingly high. Compared to culture, PCR has the advantage of a rapid time-to-result (approximately two working days), proper identification of rare pathogens, prompt initiation of a species-targeted antifungal treatment, and prospects for automation.

Indexed as

Antifungal AgentsDNA, FungalDNA, Ribosomal SpacerFungiHumansImmunocompromised HostMicrobiological TechniquesMycosesPolymerase Chain ReactionPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityAntifungal AgentsDNA, FungalDNA, Ribosomal SpacerAntifungalBroad-range fungal ITS PCRFungal infectionMycosisSurgical site infections

Identifiers

PMID27349889
PMCPMC4924236
OpenAlexW2474646051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.