Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27349747›Full record

Trial reportBreast cancer research : BCR2016

Efficacy and safety of palbociclib in combination with letrozole as first-line treatment of ER-positive, HER2-negative, advanced breast cancer: expanded analyses of subgroups from the randomized pivotal trial PALOMA-1/TRIO-18.

Richard S Finn, John P Crown, Johannes Ettl, Marcus Schmidt, Igor M Bondarenko, Istvan Lang, Tamas Pinter, Katalin Boer, Ravindranath Patel, Sophia Randolph and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 92 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
92citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
22.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

92 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 180 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Palbociclib Rechallenge for Hormone Receptor-Positive/HER-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer: Findings from the Phase II BioPER Trial.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2023
    Trial
  7. Everolimus plus exemestane in hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer: incidence and time course of adverse events in the phase IIIb BALLET population.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2020
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Targeting CDK4/6 in breast cancer.Experimental & molecular medicine · 2025
    Review
  20. Review

32 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 10 institutions in 5 countries.

Richard S FinnDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA. RFinn@mednet.ucla.edu.
John P CrownIrish Cooperative Oncology Research Group, Dublin, Ireland.
Johannes EttlTechnical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Marcus SchmidtUniversity Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Igor M BondarenkoDnipropetrovsk Medical Academy, City Multiple-Discipline Clinical Hospital, Dnipropetrovsk, Ukraine.
Istvan LangOrszagos Onkologiai Intezet, Budapest, Hungary.
Tamas PinterPetz Aladar Megyei Oktato Korhaz, Gyor, Hungary.
Katalin BoerDepartment of Medical Oncology, Szent Margit Korhaz, Onkologia, Budapest, Hungary.
Ravindranath PatelComprehensive Blood and Cancer Center, Bakersfield, CA, USA.
Sophia RandolphPfizer Oncology, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Sindy T KimPfizer Oncology, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Xin HuangPfizer Oncology, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Patrick SchnellPfizer Oncology, New York, NY, USA.
Sashi NadanacivaPfizer Oncology, Groton, CT, USA.
Cynthia Huang BartlettPfizer Oncology, Collegeville, PA, USA.
Dennis J SlamonDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Pfizer (United States) · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USCancer Trials Ireland · IEComprehensive Blood & Cancer Center · USDnipropetrovsk State Medical Academy · UAJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DENational Institute of Criminology · HUPetz Aladár Megyei Oktató Kórház · HUSzent János Kórház · HUTechnical University of Munich · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPalbociclib is an oral small-molecule inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6. In the randomized, open-label, phase II PALOMA-1/TRIO-18 trial, palbociclib in combination with letrozole improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared with letrozole alone as first-line treatment of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative, advanced breast cancer (20.2 months versus 10.2 months; hazard ratio (HR) = 0.488, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.319-0.748; one-sided p = 0.0004). Grade 3-4 neutropenia was the most common adverse event (AE) in the palbociclib + letrozole arm. We now present efficacy and safety analyses based on several specific patient and tumor characteristics, and present in detail the clinical patterns of neutropenia observed in the palbociclib + letrozole arm of the overall safety population.

methodsPostmenopausal women (n = 165) with ER+, HER2-negative, advanced breast cancer who had not received any systemic treatment for their advanced disease were randomized 1:1 to receive either palbociclib in combination with letrozole or letrozole alone. Treatment continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, consent withdrawal, or death. The primary endpoint was PFS. We now analyze the difference in PFS for the treatment populations by subgroups, including age, histological type, history of prior neoadjuvant/adjuvant systemic treatment, and sites of distant metastasis, using the Kaplan-Meier method. HR and 95 % CI are derived from a Cox proportional hazards regression model.

resultsA clinically meaningful improvement in median PFS and clinical benefit response (CBR) rate was seen with palbociclib + letrozole in every subgroup evaluated. Grade 3-4 neutropenia was the most common AE with palbociclib + letrozole in all subgroups. Analysis of the frequency of neutropenia by grade during the first six cycles of treatment showed that there was a downward trend in Grade 3-4 neutropenia over time. Among those who experienced Grade 3-4 neutropenia, 71.7 % had no overlapping infections of any grade and none had overlapping Grade 3-4 infections.

conclusionThe magnitude of clinical benefit seen with the addition of palbociclib to letrozole in improving both median PFS and CBR rate is consistent in nearly all subgroups analyzed, and consistent with that seen in the overall study population. The safety profile of the combination treatment in all subgroups was also comparable to that in the overall safety population of the study.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBreast NeoplasmsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansLetrozoleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingNeutropeniaNitrilesPiperazinesPyridinesBiomarkers, TumorErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesLetrozoleNitrilespalbociclibPiperazinesPyridinesReceptors, EstrogenTriazolesBreast cancerCyclin-dependent kinaseEstrogen receptor-positiveHER2-negativeNeutropenia

Identifiers

PMID27349747
PMCPMC4924326
OpenAlexW2464376480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.