Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27349642›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2016

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality and beyond: the need to improve real-time feedback and physiologic monitoring.

Steve Lin, Damon C Scales

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03817892 (Assessment of the Impact of Relay Timing and CPRmeter Guidance on the Quality of External Chest Compression), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03817892 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Assessment of the Impact of Relay Timing and CPRmeter Guidance on the Quality of External Chest Compression: Compression Is Life In Cardiac Arrest - Human Study (CILICA-HS).

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, CaenRan2019 to 2025Enrolled51ConditionsCardiac Arrest, Cardiopulmonary ResuscitationArmsGuidance of the External Chest Compression, Rhythm of a relay 4 minutes
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Steve LinRescu, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. LinS@smh.ca.
Damon C ScalesInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
St. Michael's Hospital · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) has been shown to improve survival outcomes after cardiac arrest. The current standard in studies evaluating CPR quality is to measure CPR process measures-for example, chest compression rate, depth, and fraction. Published studies evaluating CPR feedback devices have yielded mixed results. Newer approaches that seek to optimize CPR by measuring physiological endpoints during the resuscitation may lead to individualized patient care and improved patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Heart ArrestCardiopulmonary ResuscitationFeedbackHumansMonitoring, PhysiologicCardiopulmonary resuscitationEnd-tidal carbon dioxideFeedbackNear-infrared spectroscopyRandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID27349642
PMCPMC4924329
OpenAlexW2442510890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.