Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27349472›Full record

ReviewHealth services research2017

A Practical Guide to Using the Positive Deviance Method in Health Services Research.

Adam J Rose, Megan B McCullough

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Health services research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01653405 (Improving Anticoagulation Control in VISN 1), which is not on this map. Cited by 50 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01653405 nacompletednot on this map

Improving Anticoagulation Control in VISN 1

TypeinterventionalSponsorVA Office of Research and DevelopmentRan2014 to 2016Enrolled1,260,576ConditionsAnticoagulants, Atrial Fibrillation, Venous ThromboembolismArmsMultifaceted behavioral intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Adam J RoseSection of General Internal Medicine, 801 Massachusetts Avenue, 2nd Floor, Boston, MA, 02118.
Megan B McCulloughCenter for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, Bedford VA Medical Center, Bedford, MA.
Bedford VA Research Corporation · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo provide practical tips for health services researchers considering the use of positive deviance (PD) methods to help explain variations in quality of care or other meaningful parameters. DATA SOURCES: Published literature and personal experience. STUDY

designNarrative review. PRINCIPAL

findingsThis review includes a discussion of possible applications of PD to health services research, some methodological choices applicable to PD, and some brief tips regarding publishing the results and incorporating them into future interventions.

conclusionsIt is hoped that this article will help health services researchers to use this valuable research method more effectively, especially those who have not done so before.

Indexed as

Health Services ResearchQuality of Health CareResearch DesignData CollectionDelivery of Health CareHumansQualitative Researchimplementation sciencePositive deviancequalitative researchquality of health carevariations in care

Identifiers

PMID27349472
PMCPMC5441507
OpenAlexW2466916011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.