ArticleIntensive care medicine2016
Beta-blockers in septic shock to optimize hemodynamics? No.
Article in Intensive care medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The association between premorbid beta blocker exposure and mortality in sepsis-a systematic review.Critical care (London, England) · 2019Pooled it
- Propafenone versus amiodarone for supraventricular arrhythmias in septic shock: a randomised controlled trial.Intensive care medicine · 2023Trial
- Impact of heart rate on Doppler echocardiography predictors of rhythm control in patients with septic shock.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Effect of premorbid beta-blockers on cardiac function and clinical outcomes in septic patients: a retrospective study.Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2026Article
- Septic Cardiomyopathy: Difficult Definition, Challenging Diagnosis, Unclear Treatment.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Evaluation of Amiodarone Administration in Patients with New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation in Septic Shock.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Review
- The influence of metoprolol in patients with sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy: A retrospective study.Saudi medical journal · 2023Article
- Ventriculo-arterial (un)coupling in septic shock: Impact of current and upcoming hemodynamic drugs.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
- Septic cardiomyopathy: Diagnosis and management.Journal of intensive medicine · 2022Review
- Reliability of effective arterial elastance using peripheral arterial pressure as surrogate for left ventricular end-systolic pressure.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2019Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27349242What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.