Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27348765›Full record

ArticleCancer2016

Vulnerable elders survey and socioeconomic status predict functional decline and death among older women with newly diagnosed nonmetastatic breast cancer.

Cynthia Owusu, Seunghee Margevicius, Mark Schluchter, Siran M Koroukian, Kathryn H Schmitz, Nathan A Berger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Practical Assessment and Management of Vulnerabilities in Older Patients Receiving Chemotherapy: ASCO Guideline for Geriatric Oncology.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2018
    Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cynthia OwusuDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.
Seunghee MargeviciusCase Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio.
Mark SchluchterCase Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio.
Siran M KoroukianCase Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio.
Kathryn H SchmitzDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Nathan A BergerDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.

Funding

Reducing Functional Health Disparities among Older Breast Cancer SurvivorsR01MD009699 · NIMHD · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI OWUSU, CYNTHIA · 2015 to 2019
$2.8M
NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD009699
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe purpose of this study was to determine the ability of the Vulnerable Elders Survey (VES-13) to predict the composite outcome of functional decline and death within 12 months of breast cancer treatment among women 65 years old or older with newly diagnosed stage I to III breast cancer.

methodsTwo hundred and six participants were recruited from ambulatory oncology clinics at an academic center between April 2008 and April 2013. Participants competed the VES-13 at baseline just before neoadjuvant/adjuvant treatment. The primary outcome, functional decline/death, was defined as either a decrease of at least 1 point on the Activities of Daily Living scale and/or the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living scale or death between baseline and 12 months (yes or no).

resultsOne hundred and eighty four participants (89%) completed 12 months of follow-up. Twenty-two percent functionally declined (n = 34) or died (n = 7). Univariately, with increasing VES-13 scores, the estimated risk of functional decline/death rose from 23% for participants with a VES-13 score of 3 to 76% for participants with a VES-13 score of 10. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, VES-13 scores (adjusted odds ratio, 1.37; 95% confidence interval, 1.18-1.57) and having a high school education or less (adjusted odds ratio, 2.47; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-5.65) were independent predictors of functional decline/death (area under the receiver operator curve, 0.79).

conclusionsAmong older women with newly diagnosed nonmetastatic breast cancer, approximately 1 in 5 functionally declined and/or died within 12 months of breast cancer treatment initiation. Women with high school education or less were disproportionately affected. The VES-13 is a useful instrument for the early identification of those at risk for functional decline and/or death. Cancer 2016;122:2579-86. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

Indexed as

Geriatric AssessmentAgedAged, 80 and overBreast NeoplasmsCombined Modality TherapyComorbidityFemaleHealth SurveysHumansLongitudinal StudiesMortalityNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRisk FactorsROC CurveSocial Classbreast cancerfunctional declinelow socioeconomic statusolder women

Identifiers

PMID27348765
PMCPMC5027843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.