SynthesisPloS one2016
Development of a Publicly Available, Comprehensive Database of Fiber and Health Outcomes: Rationale and Methods.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Health Impact Database Development for Sweeteners and Sweetness Enhancers: The SWEET Project.Nutrition bulletin · 2025Article
- Development of a topic-specific bibliographic database supporting the updates of SPIRIT 2013 and CONSORT 2010.Cochrane evidence synthesis and methods · 2024Article
- Physiologic Effects of Isolated or Synthetic Dietary Fiber in Children: A Scoping Review.Current developments in nutrition · 2024Article
- Shotgun Metagenomic Sequencing Revealed the Prebiotic Potential of a Fruit Juice Drink with Fermentable Fibres in Healthy Humans.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Dietary Intake of Monosaccharides from Foods is Associated with Characteristics of the Gut Microbiota and Gastrointestinal Inflammation in Healthy US Adults.The Journal of nutrition · 2023Observational
- Gastrointestinal Effects and Tolerance of Nondigestible Carbohydrate Consumption.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2022Review
- Dietary Fibre Modulates the Gut Microbiota.Nutrients · 2021Review
- Dietary fiber, starch, and sugars in bananas at different stages of ripeness in the retail market.PloS one · 2021Article
- Evidence mapping to assess the available research on fiber, whole grains, and health.Nutrition reviews · 2020Review
- Using Evidence Mapping to Examine Motivations for Following Plant-Based Diets.Current developments in nutrition · 2020Review
- Microbiome, Breastfeeding and Public Health Policy in the United States: The Case for Dietary Fiber.Nutrition and metabolic insights · 2019Review
- Evaluating Whole Grain Intervention Study Designs and Reporting Practices Using Evidence Mapping Methodology.Nutrients · 2018Review
- Dietary intakes of flavan-3-ols and cardiovascular health: a field synopsis using evidence mapping of randomized trials and prospective cohort studies.Systematic reviews · 2018Review
- Modulation of the Gastrointestinal Microbiome with Nondigestible Fermentable Carbohydrates To Improve Human Health.Microbiology spectrum · 2017Review
- Dietary Fiber and the Human Gut Microbiota: Application of Evidence Mapping Methodology.Nutrients · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDietary fiber is a broad category of compounds historically defined as partially or completely indigestible plant-based carbohydrates and lignin with, more recently, the additional criteria that fibers incorporated into foods as additives should demonstrate functional human health outcomes to receive a fiber classification. Thousands of research studies have been published examining fibers and health outcomes.
objectives(1) Develop a database listing studies testing fiber and physiological health outcomes identified by experts at the Ninth Vahouny Conference; (2) Use evidence mapping methodology to summarize this body of literature. This paper summarizes the rationale, methodology, and resulting database. The database will help both scientists and policy-makers to evaluate evidence linking specific fibers with physiological health outcomes, and identify missing information.
methodsTo build this database, we conducted a systematic literature search for human intervention studies published in English from 1946 to May 2015. Our search strategy included a broad definition of fiber search terms, as well as search terms for nine physiological health outcomes identified at the Ninth Vahouny Fiber Symposium. Abstracts were screened using a priori defined eligibility criteria and a low threshold for inclusion to minimize the likelihood of rejecting articles of interest. Publications then were reviewed in full text, applying additional a priori defined exclusion criteria. The database was built and published on the Systematic Review Data Repository (SRDR™), a web-based, publicly available application.
conclusionsA fiber database was created. This resource will reduce the unnecessary replication of effort in conducting systematic reviews by serving as both a central database archiving PICO (population, intervention, comparator, outcome) data on published studies and as a searchable tool through which this data can be extracted and updated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.