Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27348548›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2016

Model Constrained by Visual Hierarchy Improves Prediction of Neural Responses to Natural Scenes.

Ján Antolík, Sonja B Hofer, James A Bednar, Thomas D Mrsic-Flogel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The neuroconnectionist research programme.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Energy Guided Diffusion for Generating Neurally Exciting Images.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. AnFrontiers in neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ján AntolíkUnité de Neurosciences, Information et Complexité, CNRS UPR 3293, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Sonja B HoferDepartment of Neuroscience, Physiology and Pharmacology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
James A BednarInstitute for Adaptive and Neural Computation, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Thomas D Mrsic-FlogelDepartment of Neuroscience, Physiology and Pharmacology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 095074
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate estimation of neuronal receptive fields is essential for understanding sensory processing in the early visual system. Yet a full characterization of receptive fields is still incomplete, especially with regard to natural visual stimuli and in complete populations of cortical neurons. While previous work has incorporated known structural properties of the early visual system, such as lateral connectivity, or imposing simple-cell-like receptive field structure, no study has exploited the fact that nearby V1 neurons share common feed-forward input from thalamus and other upstream cortical neurons. We introduce a new method for estimating receptive fields simultaneously for a population of V1 neurons, using a model-based analysis incorporating knowledge of the feed-forward visual hierarchy. We assume that a population of V1 neurons shares a common pool of thalamic inputs, and consists of two layers of simple and complex-like V1 neurons. When fit to recordings of a local population of mouse layer 2/3 V1 neurons, our model offers an accurate description of their response to natural images and significant improvement of prediction power over the current state-of-the-art methods. We show that the responses of a large local population of V1 neurons with locally diverse receptive fields can be described with surprisingly limited number of thalamic inputs, consistent with recent experimental findings. Our structural model not only offers an improved functional characterization of V1 neurons, but also provides a framework for studying the relationship between connectivity and function in visual cortical areas.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAnimalsComputer SimulationMiceNerve NetNeural PathwaysPattern Recognition, VisualThalamusVisual CortexVisual Fields

Identifiers

PMID27348548
PMCPMC4922657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.