Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27348292›Full record

ArticleProteins2016

FF12MC: A revised AMBER forcefield and new protein simulation protocol.

Yuan-Ping Pang

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proteins, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Discovery of a Natural Product with Potent Efficacy Against SARS-CoV-2 by Drug Screening.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. HD5 and LL-37 Inhibit SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 Binding to Human ACE2 by Molecular Simulation.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Why Computed Protein Folding Landscapes Are Sensitive to the Water Model.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yuan-Ping PangComputer-Aided Molecular Design Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. pang@mayo.edu.
Mayo Clinic in Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Specialized to simulate proteins in molecular dynamics (MD) simulations with explicit solvation, FF12MC is a combination of a new protein simulation protocol employing uniformly reduced atomic masses by tenfold and a revised AMBER forcefield FF99 with (i) shortened CH bonds, (ii) removal of torsions involving a nonperipheral sp(3) atom, and (iii) reduced 1-4 interaction scaling factors of torsions ϕ and ψ. This article reports that in multiple, distinct, independent, unrestricted, unbiased, isobaric-isothermal, and classical MD simulations FF12MC can (i) simulate the experimentally observed flipping between left- and right-handed configurations for C14-C38 of BPTI in solution, (ii) autonomously fold chignolin, CLN025, and Trp-cage with folding times that agree with the experimental values, (iii) simulate subsequent unfolding and refolding of these miniproteins, and (iv) achieve a robust Z score of 1.33 for refining protein models TMR01, TMR04, and TMR07. By comparison, the latest general-purpose AMBER forcefield FF14SB locks the C14-C38 bond to the right-handed configuration in solution under the same protein simulation conditions. Statistical survival analysis shows that FF12MC folds chignolin and CLN025 in isobaric-isothermal MD simulations 2-4 times faster than FF14SB under the same protein simulation conditions. These results suggest that FF12MC may be used for protein simulations to study kinetics and thermodynamics of miniprotein folding as well as protein structure and dynamics. Proteins 2016; 84:1490-1516. © 2016 The Authors Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Indexed as

Molecular Dynamics SimulationAnimalsAntigens, Tumor-Associated, CarbohydrateAprotininComputational BiologyHumansKineticsMuramidaseOligopeptidesPeptidesProtein FoldingProtein RefoldingProtein Structure, SecondaryProtein UnfoldingThermodynamicsUbiquitinAntigens, Tumor-Associated, CarbohydrateAprotininchignolinGb3 antigenMuramidaseOligopeptidesPeptidesTrp-cage peptideUbiquitinYYDPETGTWYBPTIchignolinCLN025force fieldmolecular dynamics simulationprotein dynamicsprotein foldingprotein simulationprotein structure refinementTrp-cage

Identifiers

PMID27348292
PMCPMC5129589
OpenAlexW2952256641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.