Observational studyJournal of managed care & specialty pharmacy2016
Economic Burden of Illness Among Patients with Severe Asthma in a Managed Care Setting.
Observational study in Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
51 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 123 citations in OpenAlex.
- Matching-adjusted comparison of oral corticosteroid reduction in asthma: Systematic review of biologics.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2020Pooled it
- Matching-adjusted indirect comparison of benralizumabThe European respiratory journal · 2018Pooled it
- NAVIGATOR: a phase 3 multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tezepelumab in adults and adolescents with severe, uncontrolled asthma.Respiratory research · 2020Trial
- Expression of eosinophil β chain-signaling cytokines receptors, outer-membrane integrins, and type 2 inflammation biomarkers in severe non-allergic eosinophilic asthma.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2019Trial
- Efficacy and Safety of Biologic Therapies for Uncontrolled Asthma: An Overview of Systematic Reviews.Pediatric pulmonology · 2026Review
- Article
- Impact of Overweight and Obesity in Severe Asthma Patients and Its Influence on Achieving Clinical Remission.Journal of asthma and allergy · 2026Article
- Recent Advances and New Therapeutic Goals in the Management of Severe Asthma.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2026Review
- Real-World Adherence to Biologic Therapy for Severe Asthma in Children.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2025Article
- Prevalence and burden of asthma in five European countries: a retrospective cross-sectional study.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Rhinovirus as a driver of airway T cell dynamics in children with treatment-refractory recurrent wheeze.JCI insight · 2025Article
- Natural killer cells in the lung: novel insight and future challenge in the airway diseases.ERJ open research · 2025Review
- Association between monocyte-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio and mortality in a population with asthma: a cohort study.Lipids in health and disease · 2025Article
- The Impact of Biological Therapies and the Significance of Their Adherence on Asthma Outcomes in a Single Tertiary Asthma Center.Journal of asthma and allergy · 2025Article
- Modeling severe uncontrolled asthma: Transitioning away from health states.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2024Article
- Epidemiology of patients with severe asthma in Japan: a nationwide descriptive study.ERJ open research · 2024Article
- Comparative efficacy of biologics for patients with inadequately controlled asthma: A network meta-analysis.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2024Article
- Long-term multicenter comparison shows equivalent efficacy of monoclonal antibodies in severe asthma therapy.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2024Article
- A cost comparison of benralizumab, mepolizumab, and dupilumab in patients with severe asthma: A US third-party payer perspective.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2023Article
- Incremental cost burden among patients with severe uncontrolled asthma in the United States.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite intensive pharmacotherapy, a considerable number of patients with severe asthma have inadequate disease control. Patients with severe asthma who experience exacerbations consume significant health care resources.
objectiveTo assess health care resource utilization and associated costs among patients with persistent severe asthma who experienced exacerbations compared with patients with persistent but nonsevere asthma.
methodsThis retrospective analysis of a national administrative claims database identified patients aged ≥ 12 years who had at least 1 medical claim with an asthma diagnosis in 2012 and had continuous medical and pharmacy coverage under a commercial or Medicare Advantage plan from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2013. Patients were assigned to 1 of 2 mutually exclusive cohorts-persistent asthma (PA) or severe asthma (SA)-according to an established algorithm based on asthma-related health care resource use and pharmacy claims for controller medication. SA patients were required to meet PA criteria and also have evidence of ≥2 asthma exacerbations in 2012. Asthma-related health care resource utilization and costs were computed from asthma medication use (rescue and controller therapy) and medical claims with an asthma diagnosis in the primary position in 2012 and 2013. Adherence to controller therapy was assessed over 365 days by using the proportion of days covered (PDC), starting with the first claim for controller therapy in 2012. Differences between the PA and SA cohorts were analyzed by t-test for continuous variables and chi-square test for categorical variables. Asthma-related costs in 2013 were also analyzed using a generalized linear model with a gamma distribution and log link, adjusted for patient demographics (age, gender, region, and insurance type) and Quan-Charlson comorbidity score.
resultsA total of 65,359 patients were included: 63,597 (97.3%) PA patients and 1,762 SA patients (2.7%). Compared with the PA cohort, the SA cohort was older (mean age = 50.8 years vs. 46.5 years, P < 0.001) and had higher mean comorbidity score (1.47 vs. 1.31, P< 0.001). The mean count of all asthma medications fills was 2.2-fold (2012) and 2.1-fold (2013) higher in the SA cohort, compared with the PA cohort (P< 0.001). Mean PDC for all oral and inhaled controller therapy was also higher in the SA cohort compared with the PA cohort (0.80 vs. 0.65, P< 0.001). SA patients had a significantly greater mean count of asthma-related hospitalizations, emergency room visits, and ambulatory visits in 2012 and 2013 (P< 0.001). Unadjusted mean annual asthma-related costs in the SA versus PA cohorts were $6,496 versus $2,739 (P < 0.001) in 2012 and $5,174 versus $1,775 (P< 0.001) in 2013. Higher asthma-related costs were driven by greater mean annual asthma medication costs in 2012 ($4,545 vs. $1,738, P< 0.001) and 2013 ($4,068 vs. $1,348, P< 0.001). Adjusted mean annual asthma-related costs in 2013 were $3,336 greater (cost ratio=2.878, P< 0.001) in the SA cohort, and adjusted mean annual asthma medication costs were $2,672 higher (cost ratio=2.982, P< 0.001) in the SA cohort.
conclusionsPatients with SA who experienced 2 or more exacerbations had 2.1-fold greater use of controller medications across both study years and were more adherent to controller therapy than patients with PA. Despite more intensive pharmacotherapy, SA patients incurred 2.9-fold higher adjusted asthma-related costs and 3-fold higher adjusted asthma medication costs than PA patients. Patients with SA consistently demonstrated a higher rate of health care utilization. DISCLOSURES: Funding for this study (HO-14-14443) was provided by GlaxoSmithKline (GSK). All listed authors meet the criteria for authorship set forth by the International Committee for Medical Journal Editors. Albers, Forshag, and Yancey are employees of GSK and hold stock in GSK. Dalal, Nagar, and Ortega were employees of GSK at the time this research was conducted. Chastek and Korrer are employees of Optum, which received consulting fees from GSK for research related to this study. Study concept and design were contributed by Chastek, Nagar, and Dalal. Korrer took the lead in data collection, along with Chastek, and data interpretation was performed by Chastek, Ortega, Forshag, and Dalal. The manuscript was written by Chastek and Dalal and revised by Albers and Yancy, assisted by the other authors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.