ArticleJournal of managed care & specialty pharmacy2016
Is There a Relationship Between Part D Medication Adherence and Part C Intermediate Outcomes Star Ratings Measures?
Article in Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- The influence of medication adherence on Medicare Star Ratings: A decade-long analysis of health plan performance.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2025Article
- Estimating the economic impact of blister-packaging on medication adherence and health care costs for a Medicare Advantage health plan.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2024Article
- Effects of star ratings bonus payments on disparities in medication utilization issues.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2023Article
- Solving racial/ethnic disparities associated with Medicare Part D Star Ratings.Current medical research and opinion · 2023Article
- Racial and ethnic disparities due to Medicare Part D Star Ratings criteria among kidney transplant patients with diabetes, hypertension, and/or dyslipidemia.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2022Article
- Patient preferences for medication adherence financial incentive structures: A discrete choice experiment.Research in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP · 2021Article
- Association of Medication Adherence with Hospital Utilization and Costs Among Elderly with Diabetes Enrolled in a State Pharmaceutical Assistance Program.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2020Observational
- Impact of Appointment-Based Medication Synchronization on Proportion of Days Covered for Chronic Medications.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Article
- The Effect of Plan Type and Comprehensive Medication Reviews on High-Risk Medication Use.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2018Article
- Refill-Based Medication Use Quality Measures in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Examination of Proportion of Days Covered and Medication Possession Ratio.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2018Article
- Achievement of Glycated Hemoglobin Goals in the US Remains Unchanged Through 2014.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundImprovements in the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) star ratings Part D medication adherence measures may affect performance in Part C intermediate outcome measures for which the Part D targeted medication classes are prescribed.
objectiveTo determine if Part D medication adherence measures are associated with corresponding Part C intermediate outcome measures.
methodsThis was a cross-sectional analysis using the CMS 2015 star ratings report (based on 2013 benefit year plan data) for Medicare contracts. The measures of interest included the Part D adherence measures for diabetes medications, antihypertensive agents, and statins and the Part C intermediate outcome measures for controlled blood sugar, blood pressure, and cholesterol. All Medicare Advantage Prescription Drug (MAPD) contracts with complete data for all Part C and D measures of interest were included. Contracts with ≥ 25% of total enrollment with MA-only benefit were excluded. Linear and logistic regression models were used to assess the association between 2015 Part D adherence measures and Part C intermediate outcome measures (n = 366). The regression models were adjusted for low-income subsidy (LIS) beneficiary enrollment and log-transformed (natural logarithm) total contract enrollment.
resultsBivariate linear regression models demonstrated moderate positive associations between each of the 2015 Part D adherence scores and related 2015 Part C measures that explained 27%-29% (R(2)) of variance. Including LIS and total contract enrollment in the regression models increased the R2 to 30%-36%. The multivariate logistic regression models showed that each percentage point of improvement in the 2015 Part D adherence measures was associated with a 4.13 to 4.69 greater odds of performing in the top quartile in corresponding 2015 Part C measures.
conclusionsModerate positive associations were observed between the Part D and Part C scores in the same benefit year. MAPD plans may observe improved Part C intermediate outcome measures with strategies that improve Part D medication adherence measures. DISCLOSURES: This study was conducted by MedImpact Healthcare Systems, San Diego, California, without external funding. All authors are employees of MedImpact Healthcare Systems. Erickson reports advisory board fees from Sanofi and AstraZeneca. Ta, Erickson, and Patel were responsible for study concept and design and data interpretation, with assistance from Qiu. Qiu and Ta took the lead in data collection, assisted by Erickson. Ta wrote the manuscript, which was revised by Erickson and Patel.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.