Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27348279›Full record

ArticleJournal of managed care & specialty pharmacy2016

Is There a Relationship Between Part D Medication Adherence and Part C Intermediate Outcomes Star Ratings Measures?

Jamie T Ta, Sara C Erickson, Wenyi Amanda Qiu, Bimal V Patel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Effects of star ratings bonus payments on disparities in medication utilization issues.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Achievement of Glycated Hemoglobin Goals in the US Remains Unchanged Through 2014.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jamie T Ta1 University of California, San Diego, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, La Jolla, California, and Specialty Pharmacy Research Assistant, MedImpact Healthcare Systems, San Diego, California.
Sara C Erickson2 MedImpact Healthcare Systems, San Diego, California.
Wenyi Amanda Qiu2 MedImpact Healthcare Systems, San Diego, California.
Bimal V Patel2 MedImpact Healthcare Systems, San Diego, California.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImprovements in the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) star ratings Part D medication adherence measures may affect performance in Part C intermediate outcome measures for which the Part D targeted medication classes are prescribed.

objectiveTo determine if Part D medication adherence measures are associated with corresponding Part C intermediate outcome measures.

methodsThis was a cross-sectional analysis using the CMS 2015 star ratings report (based on 2013 benefit year plan data) for Medicare contracts. The measures of interest included the Part D adherence measures for diabetes medications, antihypertensive agents, and statins and the Part C intermediate outcome measures for controlled blood sugar, blood pressure, and cholesterol. All Medicare Advantage Prescription Drug (MAPD) contracts with complete data for all Part C and D measures of interest were included. Contracts with ≥ 25% of total enrollment with MA-only benefit were excluded. Linear and logistic regression models were used to assess the association between 2015 Part D adherence measures and Part C intermediate outcome measures (n = 366). The regression models were adjusted for low-income subsidy (LIS) beneficiary enrollment and log-transformed (natural logarithm) total contract enrollment.

resultsBivariate linear regression models demonstrated moderate positive associations between each of the 2015 Part D adherence scores and related 2015 Part C measures that explained 27%-29% (R(2)) of variance. Including LIS and total contract enrollment in the regression models increased the R2 to 30%-36%. The multivariate logistic regression models showed that each percentage point of improvement in the 2015 Part D adherence measures was associated with a 4.13 to 4.69 greater odds of performing in the top quartile in corresponding 2015 Part C measures.

conclusionsModerate positive associations were observed between the Part D and Part C scores in the same benefit year. MAPD plans may observe improved Part C intermediate outcome measures with strategies that improve Part D medication adherence measures. DISCLOSURES: This study was conducted by MedImpact Healthcare Systems, San Diego, California, without external funding. All authors are employees of MedImpact Healthcare Systems. Erickson reports advisory board fees from Sanofi and AstraZeneca. Ta, Erickson, and Patel were responsible for study concept and design and data interpretation, with assistance from Qiu. Qiu and Ta took the lead in data collection, assisted by Erickson. Ta wrote the manuscript, which was revised by Erickson and Patel.

Indexed as

Medication AdherenceAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntihypertensive AgentsCross-Sectional StudiesDiabetes MellitusEvaluation Studies as TopicFemaleHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsMaleMedicare Part CMedicare Part DMiddle AgedAntihypertensive AgentsHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsPrescription Drugs

Identifiers

PMID27348279
PMCPMC10397682

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.