ArticlePloS one2016
Dissecting the Root Nodule Transcriptome of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.).
Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pan-transcriptome analysis of diverse chickpea accessions reveals specific expression patterns and genetic variations associated with agronomic traits.Plant molecular biology · 2026Article
- Uncovering potentials of an association panel subset for nitrogen fixation and sustainable chickpea productivity.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Antagonism within mutualism: host control of symbionts through nodule-specific antimicrobial peptides.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
- The developmental dynamics in cool season legumes with focus on chickpea.Plant molecular biology · 2023Review
- An integrated transcriptome mapping the regulatory network of coding and long non-coding RNAs provides a genomics resource in chickpea.Communications biology · 2022Article
- Defining the mutation sites in chickpea nodulation mutants PM233 and PM405.BMC plant biology · 2022Article
- Evolutionary and functional analysis of two-component system in chickpea reveals CaRR13, a TypeB RR, as positive regulator of symbiosis.Plant biotechnology journal · 2021Article
- Fulvic acid increases forage legume growth inducing preferential up-regulation of nodulation and signalling-related genes.Journal of experimental botany · 2020Article
- Gene Expression in Nitrogen-Fixing Symbiotic Nodule Cells inThe Plant cell · 2020Review
- A comprehensive analysis of the B3 superfamily identifies tissue-specific and stress-responsive genes in chickpea (3 Biotech · 2019Article
- Genome-wide identification and evolutionary analysis of TGA transcription factors in soybean.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Current advances in chickpea genomics: applications and future perspectives.Plant cell reports · 2018Review
- Transcriptional Reprogramming of Legume Genomes: Perspective and Challenges Associated With Single-Cell and Single Cell-Type Approaches During Nodule Development.Frontiers in plant science · 2018Article
- Morphotype of bacteroids in different legumes correlates with the number and type of symbiotic NCR peptides.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A hallmark trait of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.), like other legumes, is the capability to convert atmospheric nitrogen (N2) into ammonia (NH3) in symbiotic association with Mesorhizobium ciceri. However, the complexity of molecular networks associated with the dynamics of nodule development in chickpea need to be analyzed in depth. Hence, in order to gain insights into the chickpea nodule development, the transcriptomes of nodules at early, middle and late stages of development were sequenced using the Roche 454 platform. This generated 490.84 Mb sequence data comprising 1,360,251 reads which were assembled into 83,405 unigenes. Transcripts were annotated using Gene Ontology (GO), Cluster of Orthologous Groups (COG) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) metabolic pathways analysis. Differential expression analysis revealed that a total of 3760 transcripts were differentially expressed in at least one of three stages, whereas 935, 117 and 2707 transcripts were found to be differentially expressed in the early, middle and late stages of nodule development respectively. MapMan analysis revealed enrichment of metabolic pathways such as transport, protein synthesis, signaling and carbohydrate metabolism during root nodulation. Transcription factors were predicted and analyzed for their differential expression during nodule development. Putative nodule specific transcripts were identified and enriched for GO categories using BiNGO which revealed many categories to be enriched during nodule development, including transcription regulators and transporters. Further, the assembled transcriptome was also used to mine for genic SSR markers. In conclusion, this study will help in enriching the transcriptomic resources implicated in understanding of root nodulation events in chickpea.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.