Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27348098›Full record

ReviewCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique2016

Designing exposure registries for improved tracking of occupational exposure and disease.

Victoria H Arrandale, Stephen Bornstein, Andrew King, Timothy K Takaro, Paul A Demers

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Victoria H ArrandaleOccupational Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Care Ontario, 525 University Avenue (3-010), ON, M5G 1X3, Canada. victoria.arrandale@cancercare.on.ca.
Stephen BornsteinCentre of Applied Health Research, Memorial University, St. John's, NL, Canada.
Andrew KingSchool of Labour Studies, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Timothy K TakaroFaculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.
Paul A DemersOccupational Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Care Ontario, 525 University Avenue (3-010), ON, M5G 1X3, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesRegistries are one strategy for collecting information on occupational exposure and disease in populations. Recently leaders in the Canadian occupational health and safety community have shown an interest in the use of occupational exposure registries. The primary goal of this study was to review a series of Canadian exposure registries to identify their strengths and weaknesses as a tool for tracking occupational exposure and disease in Canada. A secondary goal was to identify the features of an exposure registry needed to specifically contribute to prevention, including the identification of new exposure-disease relationships.

methodsA documentary review of five exposure registries from Canada was completed. Strengths and limitations of the registries were compared and key considerations for designing new registries were identified.

resultsThe goals and structure of the exposure registries varied considerably. Most of the reviewed registries had voluntary registration, which presents challenges for the use of the data for either surveillance or epidemiology. It is recommended that eight key issues be addressed when planning new registries: clear registry goal(s), a definition of exposure, data to be collected (and how it will be used), whether enrolment will be mandatory, as well as ethical, privacy and logistical considerations.

conclusionsWhen well constructed, an exposure registry can be a valuable tool for surveillance, epidemiology and ultimately the prevention of occupational disease. However, exposure registries also have a number of actual and potential limitations that need to be considered.

Indexed as

RegistriesCanadaHumansOccupational DiseasesOccupational ExposurePopulation Surveillance

Identifiers

PMID27348098
PMCPMC6972139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.