Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27347989›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2016

Respiratory Health in Waste Collection and Disposal Workers.

Luigi Vimercati, Antonio Baldassarre, Maria Franca Gatti, Luigi De Maria, Antonio Caputi, Angelica A Dirodi, Francesco Cuccaro, Raffaello Maria Bellino

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Health impact of exposure to asbestos in polluted area of Southern Italy.Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene · 2019
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Luigi VimercatiInterdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Occupational Medicine "B. Ramazzini", University of Bari Medical School, Bari 70124, Italy. luigi.vimercati@uniba.it.
Antonio BaldassarreInterdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Occupational Medicine "B. Ramazzini", University of Bari Medical School, Bari 70124, Italy. antonio.baldassarre@uniba.it.
Maria Franca GattiInterdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Occupational Medicine "B. Ramazzini", University of Bari Medical School, Bari 70124, Italy. mariafranca.gatti@gmail.com.
Luigi De MariaInterdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Occupational Medicine "B. Ramazzini", University of Bari Medical School, Bari 70124, Italy. luidemale@gmail.com.
Antonio CaputiInterdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Occupational Medicine "B. Ramazzini", University of Bari Medical School, Bari 70124, Italy. anto.caputi@gmail.com.
Angelica A DirodiInterdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Occupational Medicine "B. Ramazzini", University of Bari Medical School, Bari 70124, Italy. angelica.dirodi@gmail.com.
Francesco CuccaroHealth Local Unit of Barletta-Andria-Trani, Barletta 76121, Italy. francesco_cuccaro@hotmail.com.
Raffaello Maria BellinoHealth Local Unit of Bari, Bari 70122, Italy. raffaello.bellino@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Waste management, namely, collection, transport, sorting and processing, and disposal, is an issue of social concern owing to its environmental impact and effects on public health. In fact, waste management activities are carried out according to procedures that can have various negative effects on the environment and, potentially, on human health. The aim of our study was to assess the potential effects on respiratory health of this exposure in workers in the waste management and disposal field, as compared with a group of workers with no occupational exposure to outdoor pollutants. The sample consisted of a total of 124 subjects, 63 waste collectors, and 61 office clerks. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects before inclusion in the study. The entire study population underwent pulmonary function assessments with spirometry and completed two validated questionnaires for the diagnosis of rhinitis and chronic bronchitis. Statistical analyses were performed using STATA 13. Spirometry showed a statistically significant reduction in the mean Tiffenau Index values in the exposed workers, as compared with the controls, after adjusting for the confounding factors of age, BMI, and smoking habit. Similarly, the mean FEV1 values were lower in the exposed workers than in the controls, this difference being again statistically significant. The FVC differences measured in the two groups were not found to be statistically significant. We ran a cross-sectional study to investigate the respiratory health of a group of workers in the solid waste collection and disposal field as compared with a group of office workers. In agreement with most of the data in the literature, our findings support the existence of a prevalence of respiratory deficits in waste disposal workers. Our data suggest the importance of adopting preventive measures, such as wearing specific individual protection devices, to protect this particular category of workers from adverse effects on respiratory health.

Indexed as

Occupational ExposureWaste ManagementAdultAgedBronchitis, ChronicCross-Sectional StudiesEnvironmental PollutantsHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedOccupational DiseasesRefuse DisposalRhinitisSpirometrySurveys and QuestionnairesEnvironmental Pollutantsbioaerosolendotoxinsoccupational exposureoccupational respiratory diseasewaste workers

Identifiers

PMID27347989
PMCPMC4962172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.