Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27347756›Full record

ArticleNature biotechnology2016

Quantitative comparison of DNA methylation assays for biomarker development and clinical applications.

BLUEPRINT consortium

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation StudyMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature biotechnology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03353597 (Reversing Epigenetic & Other Markers of Senescence by Transfusing Young Plasma To Older Human Subjects), which is not on this map. Cited by 169 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
169citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03353597 phase1 / phase2unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Reversing Epigenetic & Other Markers of Senescence by Transfusing Young Plasma To Older Human Subjects

TypeinterventionalSponsorChandra DuggiralaRan2018 to 2022Enrolled2,120ConditionsAgingArmsPlasma Transfusion
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

169 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Gestational Vitamin D Supplementation Leads to Reduced Perinatal RXRA DNA Methylation: Results From the MAVIDOS Trial.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2019
    Trial
  2. Development of the cf-MMSP Assay for Enhanced Analytical Sensitivity of Methylated DNA in Breast Cancer Liquid Biopsy.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. UrinaryTranslational andrology and urology · 2026
    Article
  8. Small-scale external quality assessment of methylatedClinical chemistry and laboratory medicine · 2026
    Article
  9. Mitoepigenetic Alterations in Early-Onset Parkinson's Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  10. Cancers · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Reduced Methylation of IRF5 Gene as a Biomarker for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

109 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

BLUEPRINT consortium

Funding

Genome-methylome InteractionsR01GM097253 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI ZHANG, KUN · 2011 to 2014
$1.4M
Austrian Science Fund FWF I 1575Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/G020930/1Medical Research Council G0800270Medical Research Council MR/J001597/1NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM097253Wellcome Trust 095606
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA methylation patterns are altered in numerous diseases and often correlate with clinically relevant information such as disease subtypes, prognosis and drug response. With suitable assays and after validation in large cohorts, such associations can be exploited for clinical diagnostics and personalized treatment decisions. Here we describe the results of a community-wide benchmarking study comparing the performance of all widely used methods for DNA methylation analysis that are compatible with routine clinical use. We shipped 32 reference samples to 18 laboratories in seven different countries. Researchers in those laboratories collectively contributed 21 locus-specific assays for an average of 27 predefined genomic regions, as well as six global assays. We evaluated assay sensitivity on low-input samples and assessed the assays' ability to discriminate between cell types. Good agreement was observed across all tested methods, with amplicon bisulfite sequencing and bisulfite pyrosequencing showing the best all-round performance. Our technology comparison can inform the selection, optimization and use of DNA methylation assays in large-scale validation studies, biomarker development and clinical diagnostics.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDNADNA MethylationDNA Modification MethylasesGenetic MarkersHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysPromoter Regions, GeneticReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityDNADNA Modification MethylasesGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID27347756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.