Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27347673›Full record

ArticleMedical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre2016

Eye Movement Monitoring and Maturation of Human Face Exploration.

Nadia Aguillon-Hernandez, Laëtitia Roché, Frédérique Bonnet-Brilhault, Sylvie Roux, Catherine Barthelemy, Joëlle Martineau

Open access · diamondAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nadia Aguillon-HernandezUnité Mixte de Recherche, Inserm U 930, Université François-Rabelais de Tours, Tours, France.
Laëtitia Roché
Frédérique Bonnet-Brilhault
Sylvie Roux
Catherine Barthelemy
Joëlle Martineau
Inserm · FRUniversité de Tours · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to characterize ocular exploration of neutral and emotional faces in the typical development of a child. SUBJECTS AND

methodIn this eye-tracking study, visual exploration of faces (with neutral or emotional expressions: happiness or sadness) was characterized in a population of 52 children (24 girls and 28 boys from 4 to 15 years of age) and 44 adults (22 women and 22 men from 18 to 35 years of age). The time spent on the eyes, nose and mouth of the faces was measured.

resultsAll participants spent more time on the eyes (13%) rather than the nose and mouth (6%). The youngest participants spent less time exploring the eyes than the older participants, suggesting the progressive establishment of interest in these informative regions of the face during maturation. This process seemed to occur later in females (7-9 years) than males (4-6 years).

conclusionThese results confirm the importance of the eye area and the capacity of this region to capture attention. In addition, this study shows that the exploration of this region increases with age and is lower among girls aged 4-6 years compared with boys of the same age.

Indexed as

EmotionsEye MovementsFaceAdolescentAdultAge DistributionAnalysis of VarianceAttentionChildChild BehaviorChild DevelopmentChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMalePhotography

Identifiers

PMID27347673
PMCPMC5588732
OpenAlexW2469720991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.