Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27347455›Full record

ArticleApplications in plant sciences2016

A new resource for the development of SSR markers: Millions of loci from a thousand plant transcriptomes.

Richard G J Hodel, Matthew A Gitzendanner, Charlotte C Germain-Aubrey, Xiaoxian Liu, Andrew A Crowl, Miao Sun, Jacob B Landis, M Claudia Segovia-Salcedo, Norman A Douglas, Shichao Chen and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applications in plant sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Development and characterization of EST-SSR markers inApplications in plant sciences · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Richard G J HodelDepartment of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611 USA; Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611 USA.
Matthew A GitzendannerDepartment of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611 USA.
Charlotte C Germain-AubreyFlorida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611 USA.
Xiaoxian LiuDepartment of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611 USA; Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611 USA.
Andrew A CrowlDepartment of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611 USA; Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611 USA.
Miao SunFlorida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611 USA.
Jacob B LandisDepartment of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611 USA; Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611 USA.
M Claudia Segovia-SalcedoDepartamento de Ciencias de la Vida, Universidad de las Fuerzas Armadas-ESPE, Sangolquí, Ecuador.
Norman A DouglasDepartment of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611 USA.
Shichao ChenCollege of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China.
Douglas E SoltisDepartment of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611 USA; Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611 USA; The Genetics Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611 USA.
Pamela S SoltisFlorida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611 USA; The Genetics Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611 USA.
Florida Museum of Natural History · USUniversity of Florida · USTongji University · CNUniversidad de las Fuerzas Armadas ESPE · EC

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

premise of the studyThe One Thousand Plant Transcriptomes Project (1KP, 1000+ assembled plant transcriptomes) provides an enormous resource for developing microsatellite loci across the plant tree of life. We developed loci from these transcriptomes and tested their utility. METHODS AND

resultsUsing software packages and custom scripts, we identified microsatellite loci in 1KP transcriptomes. We assessed the potential for cross-amplification and whether loci were biased toward exons, as compared to markers derived from genomic DNA. We characterized over 5.7 million simple sequence repeat (SSR) loci from 1334 plant transcriptomes. Eighteen percent of loci substantially overlapped with open reading frames (ORFs), and electronic PCR revealed that over half the loci would amplify successfully in conspecific taxa. Transcriptomic SSRs were approximately three times more likely to map to translated regions than genomic SSRs.

conclusionsWe believe microsatellites still have a place in the genomic age-they remain effective and cost-efficient markers. The loci presented here are a valuable resource for researchers.

Indexed as

1KPmicrosatellite developmentneutral markersnext-generation sequencing (NGS)non-neutral markerssimple sequence repeat (SSR)transcriptomes

Identifiers

PMID27347455
PMCPMC4915922
OpenAlexW2427617349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.