ArticleF1000Research2016
The GenABEL Project for statistical genomics.
Article in F1000Research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning-based gait classification and genome-wide association identify a QTL for gait type in Colombian paso horses.iScience · 2026Article
- Genomic Regions Associated with Respiratory Disease in Holstein Calves in the Southern United States.Genes · 2025Article
- Article
- Multiple strategies association revealed functional candidate FASN gene for fatty acid composition in cattle.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Genomic regions associated with bovine respiratory disease in pacific northwest Holstein cattle.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- Genetic differences in the HLA region contribute to the variability in SARS-CoV-2 vaccine responsiveness of older persons: the Doetinchem Cohort Study.Clinical & translational immunology · 2025Article
- Article
- Potentially functional variants ofFrontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- Identification of SNPs Associated with Goose Meat Quality Traits Using a Genome-Wide Association Study Approach.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- A Guide to Genome-Wide Association Study Design for Diabetic Retinopathy.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023Review
- The APOE locus is linked to decline in general cognitive function: 20-years follow-up in the Doetinchem Cohort Study.Translational psychiatry · 2022Article
- Linking genetic, morphological, and behavioural divergence between inland island and mainland deer mice.Heredity · 2022Article
- A multi-omics study of circulating phospholipid markers of blood pressure.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Novel genetic variants associated with brain functional networks in 18,445 adults from the UK Biobank.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Age- and Sex-Related Topological Organization of Human Brain Functional Networks and Their Relationship to Cognition.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2021Article
- Effects of Estradiol on Immunoglobulin G Glycosylation: Mapping of the Downstream Signaling Mechanism.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Article
- Genome-Wide Association Study-Based Identification of SNPs and Haplotypes Associated With Goose Reproductive Performance and Egg Quality.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Autozygosity influences cardiometabolic disease-associated traits in the AWI-Gen sub-Saharan African study.Nature communications · 2020Article
- Genome-wide associations of human gut microbiome variation and implications for causal inference analyses.Nature microbiology · 2020Article
- A population-based approach for gene prioritization in understanding complex traits.Human genetics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Development of free/libre open source software is usually done by a community of people with an interest in the tool. For scientific software, however, this is less often the case. Most scientific software is written by only a few authors, often a student working on a thesis. Once the paper describing the tool has been published, the tool is no longer developed further and is left to its own device. Here we describe the broad, multidisciplinary community we formed around a set of tools for statistical genomics. The GenABEL project for statistical omics actively promotes open interdisciplinary development of statistical methodology and its implementation in efficient and user-friendly software under an open source licence. The software tools developed withing the project collectively make up the GenABEL suite, which currently consists of eleven tools. The open framework of the project actively encourages involvement of the community in all stages, from formulation of methodological ideas to application of software to specific data sets. A web forum is used to channel user questions and discussions, further promoting the use of the GenABEL suite. Developer discussions take place on a dedicated mailing list, and development is further supported by robust development practices including use of public version control, code review and continuous integration. Use of this open science model attracts contributions from users and developers outside the "core team", facilitating agile statistical omics methodology development and fast dissemination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.