ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2016
Effect of kidney-reinforcing and marrow-beneficial Chinese medicine on bone metabolism-related factors following spinal cord injury in rats.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Beyond the initial impact: a systematic review of post-traumatic bone loss and its mechanisms.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present study aimed to investigate the effect of traditional Chinese kidney reinforcing and marrow-beneficial medicine (KRMB) on the prevention and treatment of abnormal bone metabolism and osteoporosis (OP) resulting from spinal cord injury (SCI). Rat models of OP following SCI were surgically established. The rats were randomly divided into five groups: Normal; sham operation + KRMB; normal + KRMB; SCI + KRMB; and SCI model group. Bone mineral density (BMD), and the expression of bone gamma-carboxyglutamic-acid containing protein (BGP), hepcidin mRNA and bone sialoprotein (BSP) were recorded at 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 weeks after the operation. BMD expression in the SCI model group was significantly lower compared with the normal, sham + KRMB and normal + KRMB groups at 4, 6, 8 and 10 weeks (P<0.01), and was significantly lower than that in the SCI + KRMB group at 6 (P<0.05), 8 and 10 weeks (P<0.01). The level of serum BGP in the SCI model group was significantly higher compared with the normal, sham + KRMB and normal + KRMB groups at each time point (P<0.01), and lower than the SCI + KRMB group (P<0.01). The SCI + KRMB group was significantly higher than the normal, sham operation + KRMB and normal + KRMB groups (P<0.01). Hepcidin mRNA expression in the rat livers in the normal, sham + KRMB and normal + KRMB group was significantly higher than that in the SCI + KRMB group and SCI model group at each time point (P<0.01). Hepcidin mRNA expression in the SCI + KRMB group was significantly higher than that in the SCI model group at 1 week (P<0.01), and significantly higher than the SCI model group at 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 weeks (P<0.01). BSP expression in the SCI model group was significantly higher than that in the normal, sham + KRMB and normal + KRMB groups at each time point (P<0.01). BSP expression in SCI model group was higher than that in the SCI + KRMB group at 1 (P<0.05), 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 weeks (P<0.01). In conclusion, KRMB traditional Chinese medicine may have a curative effect on secondary OP resulting from SCI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.