Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27346991›Full record

ArticleGerman medical science : GMS e-journal2016

Impact of caesarean section on mode of delivery, pregnancy-induced and pregnancy-associated disorders, and complications in the subsequent pregnancy in Germany.

Louis Jacob, Sevil Taskan, George Macharey, Ingeborg Sechet, Volker Ziller, Karel Kostev

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in German medical science : GMS e-journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Louis JacobDepartment of Biology, École Normale Supérieure de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Sevil TaskanDepartment of Gynecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, Hospital of Gynecology and Obstetrics University, Hospital Gießen und Marburg, Marburg (Lahn), Germany.
George MachareyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University and Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Ingeborg SechetDepartment of Gynecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, Hospital of Gynecology and Obstetrics University, Hospital Gießen und Marburg, Marburg (Lahn), Germany.
Volker ZillerDepartment of Gynecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, Hospital of Gynecology and Obstetrics University, Hospital Gießen und Marburg, Marburg (Lahn), Germany.
Karel KostevIMS Health, Frankfurt, Germany.
Philipps University of Marburg · DEÉcole Normale Supérieure de Lyon · FRHelsinki University Hospital · FIUniversitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo analyze the impact of caesarean section (CS) on mode of delivery, pregnancy-induced and pregnancy-associated disorders, as well as complications in the subsequent pregnancy within German gynecological practices.

methods1,801 women with CS and 1,801 matched women with vaginal delivery (VD) from the IMS Disease Analyzer database were included. The impact of previous CS on the mode of delivery and pregnancy-associated disorders as well as complications prior to or during birth in the subsequent pregnancy were analyzed. Cox regressions were used to determine the influence of CS with regard to these outcomes.

resultsMedical abortion and single spontaneous delivery were significantly less frequent in women with a history of CS compared to VD (OR equal to 0.52 and 0.04 respectively), whereas CS after CS was the significantly more common mode of delivery (79.0% versus 9.3%, OR=36.47). Gestational hypertension without significant proteinuria, gestational hypertension with significant proteinuria, and polyhydramnios were more frequent in women with CS than in women with VD (OR equal to 6.80, 1.71, and 2.29). Hemorrhage and maternal care for known or suspected disproportion were more common in the CS group than in the VD group (OR equal to 1.34 and 3.75). Prolonged pregnancy, preterm labor, abnormalities arising from forces of labor, and perineal laceration during delivery were significantly less frequent in women with CS than in women with VD (OR between 0.32 and 0.75), whereas long labor was more common (OR=2.09).

conclusionWomen with CS were more likely to undergo further CS and to develop major pregnancy-associated diseases in the following pregnancy compared to women with VD.

Indexed as

Infant, PostmatureAbortion, InducedBirth InjuriesCase-Control StudiesCephalopelvic DisproportionCesarean SectionDelivery, ObstetricDystociaFemaleGermanyHumansHypertension, Pregnancy-InducedLacerationsObstetric Labor, PrematurePerineumPolyhydramnioscaesarean sectionmode of deliverypregnancypregnancy-associated disorderspregnancy-induced disorders

Identifiers

PMID27346991
PMCPMC4908273
OpenAlexW2497355518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.