Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27346906›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental review : DR2016

Measuring the development of inhibitory control: The challenge of heterotypic continuity.

Isaac T Petersen, Caroline P Hoyniak, Maureen E McQuillan, John E Bates, Angela D Staples

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental review : DR, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Hot Executive Function Assessment Instruments in Preschool Children: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Inhibitory control tests in non-human animals: validity, reliability, and perspectives.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Psychometric properties of inhibitory control measures among youth with Down syndrome.Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR · 2023
    Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Isaac T PetersenIndiana University, USA.
Caroline P HoyniakIndiana University, USA.
Maureen E McQuillanIndiana University, USA.
John E BatesIndiana University, USA.
Angela D StaplesEastern Michigan University, USA.

Funding

Developmental Implications of Early Childhood SleepR01HD073202 · NICHD · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI BATES, JOHN E, MOLFESE, VICTORIA JANE · 2012 to 2016
$3.0M
Origins and Implications of Sleep Deficits in Mothers of ToddlersR01MH099437 · NIMH · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI BATES, JOHN E, DEATER-DECKARD, KIRBY · 2012 to 2014
$1.2M
Indiana Clinical and Translational Science Institute-T32 Program TL1TL1TR000162 · NCATS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI SHEKHAR, ANANTHA · 2012 to 2013
$264k
Neurophysiological Mechanisms in the Development of Externalizing ProblemsF31MH100814 · NIMH · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI PETERSEN, ISAAC T · 2013 to 2015
$78k
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR000162NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD073202NIMH NIH HHS F31 MH100814NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH099437
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inhibitory control is thought to demonstrate heterotypic continuity, in other words, continuity in its purpose or function but changes in its behavioral manifestation over time. This creates major methodological challenges for studying the development of inhibitory control in childhood including construct validity, developmental appropriateness and sensitivity of measures, and longitudinal factorial invariance. We meta-analyzed 198 studies using measures of inhibitory control, a key aspect of self-regulation, to estimate age ranges of usefulness for each measure. The inhibitory control measures showed limited age ranges of usefulness owing to ceiling/floor effects. Tasks were useful, on average, for a developmental span of less than 3 years. This suggests that measuring inhibitory control over longer spans of development may require use of different measures at different time points, seeking to measure heterotypic continuity. We suggest ways to study the development of inhibitory control, with overlapping measurement in a structural equation modeling framework and tests of longitudinal factorial or measurement invariance. However, as valuable as this would be for the area, we also point out that establishing longitudinal factorial invariance is neither sufficient nor necessary for examining developmental change. Any study of developmental change should be guided by theory and construct validity, aiming toward a better empirical and theoretical approach to the selection and combination of measures.

Indexed as

Changing measuresExecutive functionInhibitory controlLongitudinal factorial invarianceMeta-analysisSelf-regulation

Identifiers

PMID27346906
PMCPMC4917209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.