Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27346763›Full record

ArticleProgress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action2016

Partnership with the Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes: Establishing an Advisory Committee for Pharmacogenetic Research.

Chelsea T Morales, LeeAnna I Muzquiz, Kevin Howlett, Bernie Azure, Brenda Bodnar, Vernon Finley, Tony Incashola, Cheryl Mathias, Cindi Laukes, Patrick Beatty and 6 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. The ELSI Virtual Forum, 30 Years of the Genome: Integrating and Applying ELSI Research.The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Values and Practices to Strengthen Genetic Research Partnerships with Indigenous Communities.Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Success in Long-Standing Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) Partnerships: A Scoping Literature Review.Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2020
    Article
  14. Democratizing Precision Medicine Through Community Engagement.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Chelsea T Morales
LeeAnna I Muzquiz
Kevin Howlett
Bernie Azure
Brenda Bodnar
Vernon Finley
Tony Incashola
Cheryl Mathias
Cindi Laukes
Patrick Beatty
Wylie Burke
Mark A Pershouse
Elizabeth A Putnam
Susan Brown Trinidad
Rosalina James
Erica L Woodahl
Salish Kootenai College · USUniversity of Montana · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Surveillance genome sequencing to detect SARS-CoV-2 virus variants in MontanaP20GM103546 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA · PI BOWLER, BRUCE E · 2012 to 2021
$19.2M
Pharmacogenetics in Rural and Underserved PopulationsU01GM092676 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BURKE, WYLIE G., THUMMEL, KENNETH E. · 2010 to 2014
$9.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103546NIGMS NIH HHS P20GM103546NIGMS NIH HHS U01 GM092676NIGMS NIH HHS U01GM092676
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInclusion of American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) populations in pharmacogenetic research is key if the benefits of pharmacogenetic testing are to reach these communities. Community-based participatory research (CBPR) offers a model to engage these communities in pharmacogenetics.

objectivesAn academic-community partnership between the University of Montana (UM) and the Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes (CSKT) was established to engage the community as partners and advisors in pharmacogenetic research.

methodsA community advisory committee, the Community Pharmacogenetics Advisory Council (CPAC), was established to ensure community involvement in the research process. To promote bidirectional learning, researchers gave workshops and presentations about pharmacogenetic research to increase research capacity and CPAC members trained researchers in cultural competencies. As part of our commitment to a sustainable relationship, we conducted a self-assessment of the partnership, which included surveys and interviews with CPAC members and researchers.

resultsAcademic and community participants agree that the partnership has promoted a bidirectional exchange of knowledge. Interviews showed positive feedback from the perspectives of both the CPAC and researchers. CPAC members discussed their trust in and support of the partnership, as well as having learned more about research processes and pharmacogenetics. Researchers discussed their appreciation of CPAC involvement in the project and guidance the group provided in understanding the CSKT community and culture. DISCUSSION: We have created an academic-community partnership to ensure CSKT community input and to share decision making about pharmacogenetic research. Our CBPR approach may be a model for engaging AI/AN people, and other underserved populations, in genetic research.

Indexed as

Community-Based Participatory ResearchCommunity-Institutional RelationsPharmacogeneticsAdvisory CommitteesAgedAlaskaFemaleHumansIndians, North AmericanMaleMiddle AgedMontana

Identifiers

PMID27346763
PMCPMC5015644
OpenAlexW4251425899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.