Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27346520›Full record

ArticleHuman molecular genetics2016

Improved imputation accuracy in Hispanic/Latino populations with larger and more diverse reference panels: applications in the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos (HCHS/SOL).

Sarah C Nelson, Adrienne M Stilp, George J Papanicolaou, Kent D Taylor, Jerome I Rotter, Timothy A Thornton, Cathy C Laurie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human molecular genetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Genome-Wide Association Study of Heavy Smoking and Daily/Nondaily Smoking in the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos (HCHS/SOL).Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sarah C NelsonDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA sarahcn@uw.edu.
Adrienne M StilpDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
George J PapanicolaouDivision of Cardiovascular Sciences, NHLBI, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Kent D TaylorInstitute for Translational Genomics and Population Sciences, Los Angeles Biomedical Research, Institute and Department of Pediatrics, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA.
Jerome I RotterInstitute for Translational Genomics and Population Sciences, Los Angeles Biomedical Research, Institute and Department of Pediatrics, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA.
Timothy A ThorntonDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Cathy C LaurieDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

Funding

UCLA Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000124 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI DUBINETT, STEVEN M. · 2012 to 2015
$57.0M
Transgenic & Knock-out MouseP30DK063491 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI PETER J TONTONOZ · 2003 to 2026
$40.4M
Statistical Methods for X-Chromosome Genetic DataP01GM099568 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI THORNTON, TIMOTHY ALVIN · 2012 to 2016
$7.3M
Thalassemia Clinical Research Network, CanadaU01HL065233 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK · PI OLIVIERI, NANCY F · 2000 to 2009
$2.6M
GENETIC ARCHITECTURE OF PLASMA T-PA AND PAI-1R01HL065234 · NHLBI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI MOORE, JASON H. · 2000 to 2004
$1.7M
HISPANIC COMMUNITY HEALTH STUDY-268065233N01HC065233 · HC · COORDINATING CENTER · PI CHAMBLESS, LLOYD E · 2006 to 2006
–
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000124NHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201300005CNHLBI NIH HHS N01 HC065233NHLBI NIH HHS N01 HC065234NHLBI NIH HHS N01 HC065235NHLBI NIH HHS N01 HC065236NHLBI NIH HHS N01 HC065237NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK063491NIGMS NIH HHS P01 GM099568
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Imputation is commonly used in genome-wide association studies to expand the set of genetic variants available for analysis. Larger and more diverse reference panels, such as the final Phase 3 of the 1000 Genomes Project, hold promise for improving imputation accuracy in genetically diverse populations such as Hispanics/Latinos in the USA. Here, we sought to empirically evaluate imputation accuracy when imputing to a 1000 Genomes Phase 3 versus a Phase 1 reference, using participants from the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos. Our assessments included calculating the correlation between imputed and observed allelic dosage in a subset of samples genotyped on a supplemental array. We observed that the Phase 3 reference yielded higher accuracy at rare variants, but that the two reference panels were comparable at common variants. At a sample level, the Phase 3 reference improved imputation accuracy in Hispanic/Latino samples from the Caribbean more than for Mainland samples, which we attribute primarily to the additional reference panel samples available in Phase 3. We conclude that a 1000 Genomes Project Phase 3 reference panel can yield improved imputation accuracy compared with Phase 1, particularly for rare variants and for samples of certain genetic ancestry compositions. Our findings can inform imputation design for other genome-wide association studies of participants with diverse ancestries, especially as larger and more diverse reference panels continue to become available.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyHuman Genome ProjectFemaleHispanic or LatinoHumansMaleUnited States

Identifiers

PMID27346520
PMCPMC5179925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.