ArticleScientific reports2016
Visualising the strain distribution in suspended two-dimensional materials under local deformation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Progress in Strain Engineering of 2D-Integrated Heterostructures for Ultrasensitive Sensors.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Strain Engineering in Graphene at the Nanometer Scale.Nano letters · 2025Article
- Large band gap quantum spin Hall insulators in plumbene monolayer decorated with amidogen, hydroxyl and thiol functional groups.Nanoscale advances · 2023Article
- In-situ atomic level observation of the strain response of graphene lattice.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Atomic Force Microscopy Cantilever-Based Nanoindentation: Mechanical Property Measurements at the Nanoscale in Air and Fluid.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2022Article
- Aerosol Jet Printing of Graphene and Carbon Nanotube Patterns on Realistically Rugged Substrates.ACS omega · 2021Article
- Exceptional Elasticity of Microscale Constrained MoSACS applied materials & interfaces · 2021Article
- Electrochemical Behavior of Graphene in a Deep Eutectic Solvent.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2020Article
- Liquids relax and unify strain in graphene.Nature communications · 2020Article
- Reduced Graphene Oxide as a Monolithic Multifunctional Conductive Binder for Activated Carbon Supercapacitors.ACS omega · 2018Article
- Atomic-Scale in Situ Observations of Crystallization and Restructuring Processes in Two-Dimensional MoSACS nano · 2018Article
- Introducing Overlapping Grain Boundaries in Chemical Vapor Deposited Hexagonal Boron Nitride Monolayer Films.ACS nano · 2017Article
- Growth, structure and stability of sputter-deposited MoSBeilstein journal of nanotechnology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We demonstrate the use of combined simultaneous atomic force microscopy (AFM) and laterally resolved Raman spectroscopy to study the strain distribution around highly localised deformations in suspended two-dimensional materials. Using the AFM tip as a nanoindentation probe, we induce localised strain in suspended few-layer graphene, which we adopt as a two-dimensional membrane model system. Concurrently, we visualise the strain distribution under and around the AFM tip in situ using hyperspectral Raman mapping via the strain-dependent frequency shifts of the few-layer graphene's G and 2D Raman bands. Thereby we show how the contact of the nm-sized scanning probe tip results in a two-dimensional strain field with μm dimensions in the suspended membrane. Our combined AFM/Raman approach thus adds to the critically required instrumental toolbox towards nanoscale strain engineering of two-dimensional materials.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.