Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27346135›Full record

SynthesisHPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association2016

Prognostic value of lymph node metastases detected during surgical exploration for pancreatic or periampullary cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Lennart B van Rijssen, Poorvi Narwade, Nadine C M van Huijgevoort, Dorine S J Tseng, Hjalmar C van Santvoort, Isaac Q Molenaar, Hanneke W M van Laarhoven, Casper H J van Eijck, Olivier R C Busch, Marc G H Besselink and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Role of lymphadenectomy in resectable pancreatic cancer.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Lennart B van RijssenDepartment of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Poorvi NarwadeDepartment of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Nadine C M van HuijgevoortDepartment of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Dorine S J TsengDepartment of Surgery, Utrecht Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Hjalmar C van SantvoortDepartment of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands.
Isaac Q MolenaarDepartment of Surgery, Utrecht Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Hanneke W M van LaarhovenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Casper H J van EijckDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Olivier R C BuschDepartment of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Marc G H BesselinkDepartment of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands. Electronic address: m.g.besselink@amc.nl.
Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group
Academic Medical Center · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLErasmus MC · NLSt. Antonius Ziekenhuis · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHepatic-artery and para-aortic lymph node metastases (LNM) may be detected during surgical exploration for pancreatic (PDAC) or periampullary cancer. Some surgeons will continue the resection while others abort the exploration.

methodsA systematic search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library for studies investigating survival in patients with intra-operatively detected hepatic-artery or para-aortic LNM. Survival was stratified for node positive (N1) disease.

resultsAfter screening 3088 studies, 13 studies with 2045 patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy were included. No study reported survival data after detection of LNM and aborted surgical exploration. In 110 patients with hepatic-artery LNM, median survival ranged between 7 and 17 months. Estimated pooled mean survival in 84 patients with hepatic-artery LNM was 15 [95%CI 12-18] months (13 months in PDAC), compared to 19 [16-22] months in 270 patients with N1-disease without hepatic-artery LNM (p = 0.020). In 192 patients with para-aortic LNM, median survival ranged between 5 and 32 months. Estimated pooled mean survival in 169 patients with para-aortic LNM was 13 [8-17] months (11 months in PDAC), compared to 17 (6-27) months in 506 patients with N1-disease without para-aortic LNM (p < 0.001). Data on the impact of (neo)adjuvant therapy on survival were lacking.

conclusionSurvival after pancreatoduodenectomy in patients with intra-operatively detected hepatic-artery and especially para-aortic LNM is inferior to patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy with other N1 disease. It remains unclear what the consequence of this should be since data on (neo-)adjuvant therapy and survival after aborted exploration are lacking.

Indexed as

PancreaticoduodenectomyAmpulla of VaterCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalCommon Bile Duct NeoplasmsHepatic ArteryHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLymphatic MetastasisLymph Node ExcisionNeoplasm StagingPancreatic NeoplasmsPredictive Value of TestsRisk FactorsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID27346135
PMCPMC4925793
OpenAlexW2399806611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.