Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27345769›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2017

Patient involvement in rheumatology outpatient service design and delivery: a case study.

Savia de Souza, James Galloway, Carol Simpson, Radka Chura, Joanne Dobson, Nicola J Gullick, Sophia Steer, Heidi Lempp

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Mapping the role of patient and public involvement during the different stages of healthcare innovation: A scoping review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. How might patient involvement in healthcare quality improvement efforts work-A realist literature review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2019
    Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Savia de SouzaAcademic Rheumatology, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4953-3257
James GallowayAcademic Rheumatology, King's College London, London, UK.
Carol SimpsonAcademic Rheumatology, King's College London, London, UK.
Radka ChuraRheumatology, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Joanne DobsonRheumatology, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Nicola J GullickRheumatology, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Sophia SteerRheumatology, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Heidi LemppAcademic Rheumatology, King's College London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient involvement is increasingly recognized as important within the UK National Health Service to ensure that services delivered are relevant to users' needs. Organizations are encouraged to work with service users to achieve excellence in care. Patient education can improve health outcomes and reduce health-care costs. Mobile technologies could play a vital role in this.

aimPatient-centred development of innovative strategies to improve the experience of rheumatology outpatients. CASE STUDY: The Group Rheumatology Initiative Involving Patients (GRIIP) project was set up in 2013 as a joint venture between patients, clinicians, academics and management at a London hospital. The project saw (i) the formation of an independent patient group which provided suggestions for service improvement - outcomes included clearer signs in the outpatient waiting area, extended phlebotomy opening hours and better access to podiatry; (ii) a rolling patient educational evening programme initiated in 2014 with topics chosen by patient experts - feedback has been positive and attendance continues to grow; and (iii) a mobile application (app) co-designed with patients launched in 2015 which provides relevant information for outpatient clinic attendees and data capture for clinicians - downloads have steadily increased as users adopt this new technology.

conclusionPatients can effectively contribute to service improvement provided they are supported, respected as equals, and the organization is willing to undergo a cultural change.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAmbulatory CareDelivery of Health CareFemaleHumansLondonMaleMiddle AgedNational Health ProgramsPatient ParticipationPatient SatisfactionRheumatologySurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Kingdomoutpatient servicespatient educationpatient involvementrheumatologyservice deliveryservice user

Identifiers

PMID27345769
PMCPMC5433532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.