ReviewLife sciences in space research2016
Evaluating biomarkers to model cancer risk post cosmic ray exposure.
Review in Life sciences in space research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- Space Radiation and Cancer Risk in Astronauts: Models, Evidence, Uncertainties, and Emerging Imaging Perspectives.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2026Review
- Advances and applications of organ-on-a-chip technology.Cell reports methods · 2026Review
- Elevated SASP Factors, Reduced Antioxidant Enzymes, and Increased Tumor Susceptibility in Space Radiation-ExposedInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Spatially optimized 125I brachytherapy: a novel immunomodulatory approach based on spatially fractionated radiation therapy principles.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Phospho-Proteomics Analysis of Early Response to X-Ray Irradiation Reveals Molecular Mechanism Potentially Related to U251 Cell Radioresistance.Proteomes · 2024Article
- Annual space weather fluctuations and telomere length dynamics in a longitudinal cohort of older men: the Normative Aging Study.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2024Article
- Article
- 8-OxodG: A Potential Biomarker for Chronic Oxidative Stress Induced by High-LET Radiation.DNA · 2024Article
- Cosmic Ionizing Radiation: A DNA Damaging Agent That May Underly Excess Cancer in Flight Crews.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Space agency-specific standards for crew dose and risk assessment of ionising radiation exposures for the International Space Station.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2024Review
- Association of blood cell-based inflammatory markers with gut microbiota and cancer incidence in the Rotterdam study.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- Unraveling astrocyte behavior in the space brain: Radiation response of primary astrocytes.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Small tissue chips with big opportunities for space medicine.Life sciences in space research · 2022Article
- Geometrical Properties of the Nucleus and Chromosome Intermingling Are Possible Major Parameters of Chromosome Aberration Formation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Impact of Radiation Quality on Microdosimetry and Chromosome Aberrations for High-Energy (>250 MeV/n) IonsLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Phytochemicals: Potential Therapeutic Modulators of Radiation Induced Signaling Pathways.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Evaluating the long-term effect of space radiation on the reproductive normality of mammalian sperm preserved on the International Space Station.Science advances · 2021Article
- Dose-Effects Models for Space Radiobiology: An Overview on Dose-Effect Relationships.Frontiers in public health · 2021Review
- Longitudinal metabolic alterations in plasma of rats exposed to low doses of high linear energy transfer radiation.Journal of environmental science and health. Part C, Toxicology and carcinogenesis · 2021Article
- Exposure to galactic cosmic radiation compromises DNA repair and increases the potential for oncogenic chromosomal rearrangement in bronchial epithelial cells.Scientific reports · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Robust predictive models are essential to manage the risk of radiation-induced carcinogenesis. Chronic exposure to cosmic rays in the context of the complex deep space environment may place astronauts at high cancer risk. To estimate this risk, it is critical to understand how radiation-induced cellular stress impacts cell fate decisions and how this in turn alters the risk of carcinogenesis. Exposure to the heavy ion component of cosmic rays triggers a multitude of cellular changes, depending on the rate of exposure, the type of damage incurred and individual susceptibility. Heterogeneity in dose, dose rate, radiation quality, energy and particle flux contribute to the complexity of risk assessment. To unravel the impact of each of these factors, it is critical to identify sensitive biomarkers that can serve as inputs for robust modeling of individual risk of cancer or other long-term health consequences of exposure. Limitations in sensitivity of biomarkers to dose and dose rate, and the complexity of longitudinal monitoring, are some of the factors that increase uncertainties in the output from risk prediction models. Here, we critically evaluate candidate early and late biomarkers of radiation exposure and discuss their usefulness in predicting cell fate decisions. Some of the biomarkers we have reviewed include complex clustered DNA damage, persistent DNA repair foci, reactive oxygen species, chromosome aberrations and inflammation. Other biomarkers discussed, often assayed for at longer points post exposure, include mutations, chromosome aberrations, reactive oxygen species and telomere length changes. We discuss the relationship of biomarkers to different potential cell fates, including proliferation, apoptosis, senescence, and loss of stemness, which can propagate genomic instability and alter tissue composition and the underlying mRNA signatures that contribute to cell fate decisions. Our goal is to highlight factors that are important in choosing biomarkers and to evaluate the potential for biomarkers to inform models of post exposure cancer risk. Because cellular stress response pathways to space radiation and environmental carcinogens share common nodes, biomarker-driven risk models may be broadly applicable for estimating risks for other carcinogens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.