Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27345022›Full record

ReviewAddiction biology2016

How to study sex differences in addiction using animal models.

Marilyn E Carroll, Wendy J Lynch

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Addiction biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marilyn E CarrollDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Wendy J LynchDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurobehavioral Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
University of Minnesota · USUniversity of Virginia · US

Funding

Statistical Analysis CoreP50DA033942 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI CARROLL, MARILYN E. · 2012 to 2017
$6.3M
Dopaminergic and Glutamatergic Mechanisms of Cocaine Addiction: Sex DifferencesR01DA024716 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI Wendy Jean Lynch · 2008 to 2026
$6.1M
PRIMATE MODEL OF DRUG ABUSE--INTERVENTION STRATEGIESR01DA002486 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI CARROLL, MARILYN E. · 1985 to 2011
$3.8M
Vulnerability to Drug Abuse: Experimental InterventionsR01DA003240 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI CARROLL, MARILYN E. · 1985 to 2010
$3.1M
Exercise as a Sex-Specific Intervention Strategy for Cocaine AddictionR01DA039093 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI LYNCH, WENDY JEAN · 2015 to 2019
$1.7M
Adolescence, Impulsivity, and Drug Abuse: Sex/HormonesR01DA019942 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI CARROLL, MARILYN E. · 2007 to 2012
$1.4M
Models for the Prevention and Treatment of Drug AbuseK05DA015267 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI CARROLL, MARILYN E. · 2002 to 2011
$1.3M
ENVIRONMENTAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL CONTROL OF DRUG ABUSER37DA003240 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI CARROLL, MARILYN E. · 1991 to 2000
$48k
NIDA NIH HHS K05 DA015267NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA033942NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA002486NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA003240NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA019942NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA024716NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA039093NIDA NIH HHS R37 DA003240
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The importance of studying sex as a biological variable in biomedical research is becoming increasingly apparent. There is a particular need in preclinical studies of addiction to include both sexes, as female animals are often excluded from studies, leaving large gaps in our knowledge of not only sex differences and potential prevention and treatment strategies but also with regard to the basic neurobiology of addiction. This review focuses on methodology that has been developed in preclinical studies to examine sex differences in the behavioral aspects and neurobiological mechanisms related to addiction across the full range of the addiction process, including initiation (acquisition), maintenance, escalation, withdrawal, relapse to drug seeking and treatment. This review also discusses strategic and technical issues that need to be considered when comparing females and males, including the role of ovarian hormones and how sex differences interact with other major vulnerability factors in addiction, such as impulsivity, compulsivity and age (adolescent versus adult). Novel treatments for addiction are also discussed, such as competing non-drug rewards, repurposed medications such as progesterone and treatment combinations. Practical aspects of conducting research comparing female and male animals are also considered. Making sex differences a point of examination requires additional effort and consideration; however, such studies are necessary given mounting evidence demonstrating that the addiction process occurs differently in males and females. These studies should lead to a better understanding of individual differences in the development of addiction and effective treatments for males and females.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalResearchSex CharacteristicsAnimalsBehavior, AddictiveFemaleMaleSex FactorsAddictionanimal modelshormonal effectsimpulsivityneurobiologysex differencestreatment

Identifiers

PMID27345022
PMCPMC4970981
OpenAlexW2472306143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.